User talk:Hasbro

If you're not a sysop/admin or Jimbo Wales, don't bother bossing me around or starting an inquisition.

Recent edits
Seeing your few recent edits, you seem to have violated WP:NPOV and WP:V quite frequently, including especially this, which reads like an opinion piece and definitely isn't non-POV, while phrases like "you people not building a fantasy world out of misnomers" could be interpreted as violations of WP:NPA. I have to advise you to read WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR and to avoid edits that obviously violate any or all of the above. Mad Jack 05:22, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * I really, really don't want to get into an edit war of any sort, but this edit is an example of original research, because we can't look up last name meanings and match them to people, etc. (i.e. if someone's last name is "O'Reilly", we can't put in that they are of Irish descent without a source that says so specifically on that person). I have no problem with putting in the specific desginations like "Ashkenazi" (which Rachel probably is, obviously) or "Sephardic", but we'd need a source that said so about Bilson. Mad Jack 16:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment at Talk:Richard II of England
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks, and comments like this one can not and will not be tolerated. If you continue in this manner, you may may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors. Thank you. -- Vary | Talk 12:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Stop the libel and disruptions of Wiki to make points, which was the issue mocked. Fix the problem instead of make it harder on those who wish to take this encyclopedia seriously. Wiki is a dumpster if all you want is to let some people break some rules and other people have to follow other rules. I take allegations of homosexuality about English monarchs very seriously, but you don't care, do you? Faggot. Hasbro 13:45, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
 * There was no libel or defamation, only the mention of cited information that could be added to the article. Note that the editor did not make any changes to the article, but made a suggestion on the talk page, and only said s/he wanted to add that Norman F. Cantor made that claim in "The Last Knight" - s/he did not want to simply add the information to the article as indisputable fact.   And if you disagreed with the point, or thought it was irrelevant, you could have made your case calmly, but you chose to curse and call the editor a 'LGBTQ freak' instead.
 * You can take discussions as seriously as you like, but be civil while you do it, please. Losing your temper won't win you any arguments here.  And not that it matters, but I'm straight, actually.  -- Vary | Talk 14:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I've blocked you for 24 hours for continuing to make personal attacks after being warned. When the block expires, please be civil. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)