User talk:Hasek is the best/Archive2007c)

Image:0222_hockey2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:0222_hockey2.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Sonic images
Please stop uploading these to wikipedia, these images taken from a camera show them on a TV screen, and they all appear unprofessional, I have removed them as all of the other images are "clean," taken from PC versions or emulators. Not to mention we already have plenty of images and don't need to go past Fair Use, if not already. 阿修羅96 01:17, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Please raise your concerns about image quality with this user in a more CIVIL manner. Thank you. Newyorkbrad 01:18, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * YA HAPPY NOW? (Just kidding, hopefully that's it.) 阿修羅96 01:20, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Responded on your talk. Hasek..., please respond to the substance of the user's comment. Newyorkbrad 01:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * You guys know each other well? 阿修羅96 01:46, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Not really, but I posted on this page once before, and I have my preferences set to watchlist any page I edit, so I noticed your original section heading in the edit summary. Newyorkbrad 01:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much!
Hasek, you are the best! Thanks for helping me fight the vandals of Shaq's Big Challenge! Best wishes to you and the rest of your editing. --JDitto 03:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Sonic1specialstage.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sonic1specialstage.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tailsfindsitems.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tailsfindsitems.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Hasek?
Indeed, Hasek is obviously better than Brodeur, but how about the greatest of all time? :) Jmlk  1  7  03:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Hello WikiProject Ice Hockey/Participant
I am an advisor to the National Hockey League. With your help over the next few months I plan to review and correct any information on wikipedia relating to the National Hockey League, its franchises, players, executives and partership organisations. I am here to provide you with information. Your work is appreciated. --NHLsource 18:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

My revert
Sorry about that. Clue bot beat me to the article and somehow I didn't get a edit conflict warning. Sorry if I appeared to be that Ip.-- Kkr ouni  /Ккроунл  /ΚκρΩυνι  17:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm just getting used to the Firefox layout to use TW, must have clicked revert edits a second after cluebot. I usually read what's been taken off, not the last revert.  Well I feel stupid!-- Kkr  ouni  /Ккроунл  /ΚκρΩυνι  17:57, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah TW isn't that much better than IE. Accualy it's slower so I've reverted 3 reverts today.  I'm going to use IE for another week before I try twinkle again.-- Kkr  ouni  /Ккроунл  /ΚκρΩυνι  18:01, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: revert in Bleach (Manga)
no worries if you look you'll see that I actually did the same thing. ^_^ -- /\sSb\/TALK/\ -- 21:24, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

redirect
i didn't mean to redirect my user disscusion page to B’Day. that was a mistake on my part. i pasted the redirect there by mistake. it won't happen again.

Dominik Hašek
Dominik Hašek fan? Nice guy, he once signed a puck and card for me. Tony the Marine 01:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

The Best
Don't know that you're the best, but you are certainly faster than I am today. LOL. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  16:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Test Work?
What test work would that be? —70.240.119.51 14:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Which edit are you referring to? —70.240.119.51 16:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That was not a test edit; that edit was to stop the page from stretching. —70.240.119.51 16:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It was to stop the page from stretching horizontally, to get rid of the horizontal scrollbar. —70.240.119.51 16:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I put in the full caption. See here. —70.240.119.51 16:26, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I noticed this edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User%3A123.2.168.215&diff=151842784&oldid=151842699

Someone put something on the user page instead of the talk page. I moved it to the talk page. Then you restored it. That's not helpful. If you are an administrator, could you please delete the user page, as it is an IP address shared by many different people, and its not appropriate to have a user page. 123.2.168.215 15:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Moving the list of "Selected home game consoles" in SNES
I'm guessing you use a high-resolution display, since you stated you are "removing space" in this edit. However, I ask you to reconsider your edit for two reasons: Thanks. Anomie 16:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) The list of selected home game consoles doesn't actually belong in the references section. They are actually cross-references to related articles, which typically go in the "See also" section.
 * 2) On a low-resolution display, placing the list there squishes the references and results in much more unused space beneath the box. Resize your browser to 800x600 to see what I mean.
 * Ok, I had a feeling someone was going to tell me something about that template. Well, only if the See also was not just above the references, and I prefer to leave out huge gaps on articles; it looks messy. (Btw, I won't be responding for an other three hours or so, because I'm going golfing. Sit tight, I'll be back. --Hasek is the best 16:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * SNES is not actually just above the references, we have SNES in between. As for gaps, as I mentioned we can apparently either have a relatively small gap above the references or have the references themselves squished into narrow columns with unused space to the right. Anomie 18:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, well the second option would be nice, but is there any way to briefen the source info? The only thing the reader really needs to know is the url, date and title. --Hasek is the best 20:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * If you're talking about "briefening" the references to include minimal information, that would be against WP:CITE. Anomie 20:13, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * But however, if you look at Dominik Hasek's article, there are only a few references that exceed one line. And it doesn't matter if the template stays in the ref heading or not, because as long as the sources are there, it's fine with me. --Hasek is the best 20:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh yeah, if all else fails, we'll use a scroll box for the sources, 75 sources should be enough for one. --Hasek is the best 20:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Actually, I think moving it up to the Market share heading, because the template is inside the see also there. I'll do it now. --Hasek is the best 20:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

(←) The references in Dominik Hasek all take up several lines on my display. Scrollboxes for references are ugly, unnecessary, and interfere with printing. Moving the box up to content sections is even worse than moving it down to the References. It's "See also" type of content, it should go in "See also". I've undone all the random moving you did, and instead left-aligned the portal link and removed the clear, which should hopefully take care of the issue. Anomie 00:42, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Jean Lafitte
User:Tiptoety auto-reverted a number edits to this article claiming I was committing vandalism. I believe my rewrites correct a number of grammar and other issues. Please compare with the version before the changes. Am I still a Wikipedia pariah, or can I get unwarned now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.38.24.214 (talk • contribs)

( responded on your talk ) - Hasek is the best 18:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Hmm, I think he spotted as you deleting portions of the article. I'd suggest you discuss it with him. Sometimes those controversial reverts happen on Wikipedia, called "a good faith" revert, meaning that tone, manual of style, unnsessary loss of info or grammar was the edit, however it was reverted. So again, you discuss it with him because I'm not the type of person who likes to handle good faith edits without knowing a thing or two about the person or structure. --Hasek is the best 18:18, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Career Statistics
After discovering you went on a bit of an edit spree changing the table format for career statistic tables, I have to remind you to stick to the Player pages format. Only goaltenders stats should use the wide (width=90%). All other skaters should either be, or for extra long tables such as Mark Messier, use. Thanks- IrisKawling 23:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Ice Hockey/Featured topic Drive
Hi, as you may or may not know, some of us at WP:HOCKEY have banded together and are trying to get the various NHL Trophy pages to FT status. It is a big job and if you would be willing to offer any assistance, it would be most appreciated. You can find out more here. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 21:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Your previous edits against me
On one comment, you said I know nothing about hockey. If you think so, then why did I join WikiProject Ice Hockey? If you know more than me, surely you? (sarcastically). (I actually mean it.) And btw you haven't said anything about your username. "CJ DUB"? What kinda last name is that? And, I'd love to hear what your favourite team is...probably those teams that get about 60-70 point a year, such as the Phoenix Coyotes. Mine's the Ottawa Senators, and they did pretty darn good, eliminating the President's Trophy winning team, Buffalo Sabres.

I actually don't seem like a 12 year old do I? If I did, Id B talkin slang like dis but no, and I was born on January 8; so I'm just past a week of being in the seventh grade. And you know, there's other 12 year olds on Wikipedia too. I'm responding because of your very immature comments. And, mature people help Wikipedia by reverting vandalism, such as blanking pages. And apparantely, you seem to get a lot of notices on this page because of your controversial edits. I do have a list of reasons why Hasek rocks, but on a talk archive. Lastly I'd like to say: Hasek didn't get injured! Woo! And better yet, he re-signed! --Hasek is the best 21:31, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Wow. Welcome to 2 months ago. Just because you join a group on Wikipedia that seeks to improve ice hockey, DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE ANY IDEA ABOUT HOCKEY, or even know how to write an article. It just means you know how to push a button to join. Good for you. Don't EVER post on my discussion page again. CJ DUB 03:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Taxi squad
The article was proposed for deletion due to this concern: This article needs to be improved to eliminate contradictions and to include other sports, among other reasons, by User:Skudrafan1. As you have challenged the prod, I've restored it per policy. -- Maxim (talk)  16:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

STOP POSTING ON MY TALK PAGE
ABOUT STUFF THAT HAPPENED TWO MONTHS AGO

Thx. CJ DUB 23:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Talkpage comments
Please do not edit-war to add back unwanted comments that another user has removed from his or her own talkpage. This practice is not helpful and tends to drag disputes out rather than help resolve them. In addition, it is important to remain civil at all times, especially in edit summaries, even when you perceive that another user is being hostile or provocative. I know that this was a very isolated problem, and thanks for your cooperation. Newyorkbrad 05:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Random Smile!


WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. -WarthogDemon 02:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Deleting Warnings
...I saw your note to an IP on their page. Just FYI, it's OK to delete from your own talk page. We strongly ENCOURAGE archiving, but the community has taken the position that the warnings remain in the page's talk history, and we as admins usually leave pretty good edit summaries so we can find them quickly. No harm done, just wanted to be sure you knew what the policy was.

I also mirror NewYorkBrad's comment above - please don't edit war them back into a user's page. - Philippe &#124; Talk 04:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Regardless of exigent speculative circumstances, we follow the policies as they are written. The user has the right to delete warnings from his own page.  It's not the way I'd have written it, but it's the policy we have.  - Philippe &#124; Talk 04:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * In any case, he just left a personal attack on his talk page, so I removed it and protected the page for 12 hours, which is the full duration of his block. - Philippe &#124; Talk 04:21, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed... please, stop replacing warnings that I am removing from my IP's talk page. Especially since it's shared, just allow the warnings to remain viewable in history. 66.28.71.162 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.71.162 (talk) 16:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Wiki Violation
Dear Hasik,

Concerning your recent harassment of me for removing a section from the article on wikipedia that violates basic wiki standards as it is completely un-verifiable, and without any sources, I am asking you to back off, otherwise I will have you banned for both breaking the rules, and harassment. 216.201.33.27 03:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Just a minute, the heading is for a topic that so far has not been proven even exists. It doesn't have to be included, and what's more as nobody but me has even contributed to the talk pages to discuss the section, I find you remarks outragious.

At any rate, I didn't write that section, nor do I care about researching it, but if somebody wants to have it in there, then they should research it and find sources for it. At any rate the entire section does not meet wiki standards of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability, and therefore should be deleted until it does. To include it is continued and deliberate breach of wiki standards. And as it is not sourced, and makes statements about men that are un-porven, that also constitutes POV, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view

At present this article has two major violations, so quite reverting this section, until you source it. 216.201.33.27 03:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Statistics
Yes I did, and yes I am aware. However, the project has recently changed the standards for the statistics and we are in the process of updating all the players. --Djsasso 07:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Senatorsupdate.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Senatorsupdate.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 18:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Prince of Wales Trophy
The page is looking pretty good, I think the history section could use a couple more sources, then it will be ready. Also, I think the entire table should be amalgamated and you could add a "definition history" list in the history section, something like this, but it's your call. Also, it wouldn't hurt to mark colour the teams in the table that have won the cup. -- Scorpion0422 23:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Alfieatboston2006.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alfieatboston2006.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 02:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Hello, fellow reverter!


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Phgao 23:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DSC00494.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00494.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

User:189.173.32.71
I agree that he is a vandal and should be blocked, but doing so would be in violation of wikipedia policy. We will both keep an eye on that user and hopefully block them. Happy Editing! Tiptoety 01:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea, but i will still keep an eye on he/r. Thank you, Tiptoety 01:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The user just vandalized Creativity once again, i gave them a leve1 4aim warn, next time we can report them. Tiptoety 01:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Ice Hockey/Featured Topic Drive
Hi, I was wondering what your status was with the project. We are very close - there are only 3 unclaimed articles left - and if we all work at it, we could be ready for an FTC by November. Thanks for the time, Scorpion0422 22:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it looks pretty good, so you should go for it. I was going to nominate the Jennings, but I'll wait a few days and stagger the noms a little. -- Scorpion0422 22:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * An article must pass an FLC before it can be an FL. You'll have to nominate it first. -- Scorpion0422 23:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Just so you know, your nom was incomplete, so I finished it for you here. -- Scorpion0422 19:37, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Prince of Wales Trophy]
There have been some issues brought up about the list. You might want to put it on watch and take a look. -- Scorpion0422 17:50, 29 September 2007 (UTC)