User talk:HashtagHEEL

March 2012
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Chris Waddle. Thank you. Tmol42 (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC) But Chris Waddle is a dick!

Citation
If you add a link you should take this form Template:Cite web--Nakurio (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Emmanuel Frimpong, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Your recent edit to the page Demba Ba appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:09, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm LM2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Bo Dallas because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Txtrooper (talk) 04:22, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shola Ameobi, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Re: Newcastle United vice captain
Or perhaps you could insert a reliable source into the article to verify this? Mattythewhite (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Happy now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by HashtagHEEL (talk • contribs) 17:45, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Not really. The reference is presented as a bare URL (see WP:CITET) and the source doesn't explicitly mention that Tioté is vice-captain. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

"after boss Alan Pardew handed him the armband with Fabricio Coloccini out for several weeks because of a thigh injury." Does that do it for you? How about a quote from Pardew himself? "Cheick has replaced Colo as skipper for now"

December 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Williamson (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

I was merely making reference to his nickname among Newcastle fans, hence the quotation marks xo

January 2014
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Jones (referee), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. QED 237  (talk)  18:59, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:25, 12 January 2014 (UTC)


 * What about this and this and this and this and this? Basically, you've been scumming up Wikipedia articles for a few years now. --jpgordon:==( o ) 23:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

All of which are easily explainable. I also notice how you don't bring up the numerous other edits I've made to Wikipedia which have been accepted, but merely choose to acknowledge the ones where I intended to provide an alternate view, ones that the 'common people' agree with. So, no, it's not 'scumming up Wikipedia articles', as you so harshly and close-mindedly put it, it's merely adding information that you as 'Wikipedians' deem to not be important.