User talk:Hassaan19

{| class="navbox collapsible " style="text-align: left; border: 1px solid silver; margin-top: 0.2em;" ! style="background-color: #CFC;" | Collapsed old warnings for readability
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " |
 * style="border: solid 1px silver; padding: 8px; background-color: white; " |

Notability of Rizwan Manji
A tag has been placed on Rizwan Manji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. FingersOn  Roids  20:00, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bessie Cursons
A tag has been placed on Bessie Cursons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R3ap3R.inc (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Nativity (20009 film)
A tag has been placed on The Nativity (20009 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ShakingSpirit talk 13:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Nativity (2009 film)
A tag has been placed on The Nativity (2009 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  16:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Nativity (2009 film)
I have nominated The Nativity (2009 film), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Nativity (2009 film). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 |  Talk  17:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Charlie Green (singer)
I have nominated Charlie Green (singer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Charlie Green (singer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Otterathome (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charlie Green (singer)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charlie Green (singer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 19:19, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Callum Francis (singer)
A tag has been placed on Callum Francis (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 11:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Brian Kubach
An article that you have been involved in editing, Brian Kubach, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SummerPhD (talk) 16:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Natalie Okri (singer)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Natalie Okri (singer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTNEWS / WP:1E

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Otterathome (talk) 17:50, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:ScarboroughYMCAJakePratt.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:ScarboroughYMCAJakePratt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:03, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dominic Smith.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Dominic Smith.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. J Milburn (talk) 16:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Dominic Smith (singer)
I have nominated Dominic Smith (singer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Dominic Smith (singer). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. J Milburn (talk) 16:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JakePrattBGT.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JakePrattBGT.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JakePratt2.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JakePratt2.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JakePratt.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:JakePratt.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 22:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Dominic Smith.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dominic Smith.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JakePratt.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JakePratt.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:JakePrattBGT.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JakePrattBGT.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:HollyHull.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:HollyHull.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:40, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HollyHullCharlie.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HollyHullCharlie.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  15:56, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HollyHullDemiLovato.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HollyHullDemiLovato.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet]  [talk]  15:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HollyHullCampjam.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HollyHullCampjam.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:HollyHullRecording.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:HollyHullRecording.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elliot Evans
A tag has been placed on Elliot Evans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Elliot Evans.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elliot Evans.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 15:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:16, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Aidan Davis.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aidan Davis.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:03, 8 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 16:03, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Aidan Davis.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aidan Davis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. • Anakin (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Aidan Davis.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Aidan Davis.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Joe-xfactor.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Joe-xfactor.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Zoo Fari  15:50, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harmony (singing duo)
A tag has been placed on Harmony (singing duo) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 12:09, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Charliewernham-2009.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Charliewernham-2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Natalie-okriaudition.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Natalie-okriaudition.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  Skier Dude ►  00:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello,. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GiantSnowman 18:16, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Please see more messages for you at User talk:82.36.17.10. EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vinnie Waldron


The article Vinnie Waldron has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, fails WP:MUSIC.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 20:25, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD
Please see [] for how to nominate articles for deletion. You have missed step III when nominating Lloyd Daniels (singer) and Joe McElderry. I42 (talk) 21:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Claude (TV series)


The article Claude (TV series) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 01:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Harmony (singing duo)
I have nominated Harmony (singing duo), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Harmony (singing duo). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 19:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

X Factor biographies
Please stop edit-warring, repeatedly splitting individual articles off of List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 6) without discussing at the talk page first to obtain consensus. Demanding it be resolved at AfD is not the right course of action: AfD is for Deletion; it is not the place to argue for or against a redirect. If you wish to contribute, the group article exists and you are not prevented from editing it. As an aside: my advice is that an AfD, if raised, would almost certainly result in delete for these bios (Jedward was an exception - no consensus was reached; the top 3 will get their own pages in due course when the top 3 is known). Once an AfD has closed as delete it is far harder to recreate the page in future if/when notability becomes marginal, so it's probably not in your best interest to force nomination now. I42 (talk) 20:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You did say the top 3 (Olly Murs, Stacey Solomon and Joe McElderry) will get their own pages. This goes with Joe McElderry, an article I created. What should be done to that page now he is in the final three?. Hassaan19 (talk) 19:27, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Traditionally, the top three have been deemed to have "placed in a major music contest" (WP:MUSIC) and therefore notable. But there is no rule set in stone, and there are other WP guidelines and policies to be taken into account as well. Because you forced Joe's page to AfD it's no longer that simple; community consensus is that the page should be a redirect. The usual way to overturn an AfD is at WP:DRV and I took the page there but was advised that a redirect just needs talk page discussion, which I started at []. However, my intention was to merely nullify the AfD so we're back to square one - not necessarily see the immediate recreation of the article. It is certainly arguable that the top three still do not have independent notability and should therefore be covered only on the X Factor pages, which they are. If there's nothing more that could be added to what we already have there's no point having a separate article. User:AnemoneProjectors is an admin with particular interest in these pages and his advice is worth listening to. He is cautioning against a rush to create separate pages and suggesting that you continue to develop the group biographies rather than duplicate effort with individual pages. That sounds like good advice to me. I42 (talk)

November 2009
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Lucie Jones, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. I42 (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lucie Jones
I have nominated Lucie Jones, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lucie Jones. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Calmer  Waters  01:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Harmony-hood.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Harmony-hood.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I42 (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Harmony Hood
I have nominated Harmony Hood, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Harmony Hood. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2 Grand, you will be blocked from editing. If you disagree, take it to WP:DRV I42 (talk) 17:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Per this following consensus for redirect at AfD. I42 (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Susan Boyle
Please explain this edit. I42 (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

I suggested it be a featured article due to the amount of page views it is getting. She is becoming a fast selling artist, and contestants like Connie Talbot have a featured article for the same reason. Hassaan19 (talk) 09:33, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Connie Talbot's article is featured not because she is a fast selling artist but because the article itself is extremely well written and conforms to our featured article criteria. Wikipedia editors have spent many hours working on it for it to meet the criteria, we can't just tag any article as featured without going through a long process of discussion.  Them From  Space  09:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello, Hassaan19. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. I42 (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hassaan19, it is to your advantage to promise to improve your behavior. This edit on 5 December, which undoes the result of the AfD that made the Joe McElderry article into a redirect, is completely unacceptable. If this is how you are going to behave on Wikipedia, it makes sense that you should be indefinitely blocked. EdJohnston (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

With this edit you have AGAIN decided to unilaterally overrule the result of the Joe McElderry AFD. Please follow process. Final warning. Nancy talk  12:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I've been accused of being you, as a sock-puppet. Also I edited your user page (which now either you or someone else has undone, rightly so because Joe's article has yet again been changed to a re-direct.) - because I re-created Joe's page due to him being in the top three - unfortunately this isn't good enough for the deletionists who's actions are causing Joe's page to STILL be a re-direct as I said, even though Wikipedia rules CLEARLY state that the top-three who are notable like Joe clearly is, should have their own pages. Well good luck mate, you have my moral support, not for any actions against Wikipedia policy of course, but for making good articles. :) Whitebrightlight (talk) 10:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * }

December 2009
for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Hassaan19, you've been undoing the result of AfD discussions for a considerable time, after multiple warnings. If you are not willing to follow consensus you may not belong on Wikipedia. You've never responded to any admin warnings, which shows that advice makes no impression on you. You've been twice at WP:ANI, and you never made an answer there. Please reconsider before this block becomes permanent. EdJohnston (talk) 14:52, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lightdownlow-cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lightdownlow-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:29, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for '''this edit. You have been repeatedly told to wait until the winner is announced but you just refuse to hear what is being said to you. You have to learn to operate within consensus.'''. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Nancy talk  09:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Nancy talk  04:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

You were blocked for this edit which specifically goes against the consensus reached at Talk:List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 6) and was also contrary to the warnings you have received previously for recreation of pages against policy. Your stubborn attitude and persistant disruptive behaviour are at odds with the collaborative and collegial nature of the Wikipedia project and I am running out of patience with you - as are many others. The next time you transgress you can expect a very long-term block. Nancy  talk  04:44, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Block extended for further two weeks & IP blocked for three months
You have been told before that you may not evade blocks and editing restrictions using your IP address 82.36.17.10 however you have resumed your disruption as soon as the prior block on the IP expired. I have therefore extended the block on your named account for a further 2 weeks and the IP address for a further 3 months. Next time it will be permanent. Nancy talk  08:17, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Unblock

 * It means that instead of "I will try" you should have said "I will". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * In particular, "I will try to not evade blocks and vandalize pages" -- why should any effort or attempts be necessary to not evade blocks and vandalize? We assume good faith around here, and part of that is assuming most people's first nature is not to vandalize and not to evade blocks. Are you somehow different? Is not evading blocks something you need to try? --jpgordon:==( o ) 22:52, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Can you explain, in your own words, what was disruptive about your previous edits? This is so that we can be confident that you have properly understood why you were blocked and be sure that you will not carry on as before. Thanks, Nancy  talk  17:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

What I feel was distruptive was removing redirects from people who have just appeared in a reality show and done nothing else. Also putting back an article from someone from X Factor, for example and arguing saying 'This person is notable now, don't redirect', that's one of the things that got me blocked. Evading blocks was one of the things that got my IP blocked for three weeks and this account for 2 weeks. As soon as the block on the IP expired I began doing stuff like removing redirects, which was distruptive. Another thing that I agree was distruptive was not accepting consensus for an article that has been redirected. I feel I should only create articles on Wikipedia that are appropriate, such as the earlier articles I have created, such as Jake Pratt, Elliot Evans, Charlie Wernham, Charlie Green (singer), Bessie Cursons, those are all reality show contestants but they are notable in some way. Articles I have created I feel were inappropriate were articles like Lucie Jones, Danyl Johnson or 2 Grand. I will continue to create appropriate articles on Wikipedia. Above is the reason what was distruptive about my edits. Hassaan19 (talk) 18:15, 30 December 2009 (UTC)}}

AJOUPA + Treyc Cohen
Hassaan, this is a completely non-notable company and I have sent the article for speedy deletion. Please read the notability requirements for companies before creating any other similar ones. I also have a grave concern about Treyc Cohen as she has no notability independent of the X factor. She is not signed to a major label, she has not had a hit record - what were you thinking of creating that article less than 24 hours after you promised to stop doing things like that? Do it once more and I will block you again. Nancy talk  12:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Same goes for A Time To Be Heard Nancy  talk  12:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Jamie Pugh
Jamie Pugh was a contestant on Britain's Got Talent. Sure he didn't get into the final but if you look at this source (http://www.jamiepugh.co.uk/jamie-pugh-has-a-record-deal/) from his fansite, it says he does have a record deal now and he has a debut single which will be released on 15 Feb 2010. I'm not sure yet whether I should create an article for him since he has a recording contract with a record label, VVR2 records and that is a major label, other BGT contestants like Hollie Steel and Elliot Evans have been signed to it and have articles. He is quite notable but i'm not sure whether I should create the article because I am worried I may be blocked again, because I was unaware about Treyc Cohen's article above because she has a single, but now I realise it didn't chart. I'm not sure yet whether I should create this article. Hassaan19 (talk) 12:39, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Jamie Pugh's fansite is not an independent reliable source & regardless, a record deal means little until he actually has a hit record. I suggest that you back away from creating articles or you are just going to get yourself in to trouble again. There are plenty of other ways you can contribute. Nancy  talk  12:48, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hassaan, have a read of WP:MUSICBIO, the notability guideline on musicians. I think the most important criteria is #2 "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." An article on Jamie Pugh isn't appropriate. I agree with Nancy that you should probably back away from creating new articles, although at least it's good that you checked before creating this one. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)


 * But would it be appropriate to create the article after it has been released or near the time, when it has charted?. I do understand what you and Nancy are talking about, backing away from creating new articles for now but will it be appropriate to create them later on. Hassaan19 (talk) 13:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Creation of articles
Like above, I am checking before I create articles to see if they are appropriate for Wikipedia. Below are the articles I have suggested putting back;


 * Lucie Jones - She finished in eighth place on X Factor. She has been signed to a modelling company so that may edge towards notable.


 * Danyl Johnson - Again, X Factor, finished in fourth place. Not sure what has happened outside of the series but he may get a record deal from Simon Cowell. John & Edward finished in sixth place and they didn't even reach the semi-finals, so Olly Murs and Stacey Solomon's pages should also be put back because they mde it to the final, and this time last year, the final three finalists (not the winner) (Eoghan Quigg and JLS) had pages, so I am wondering whether I should put back Stacey Solomon and Olly Murs' pages, also Danyl Johnson's page.

I have checked before putting back these articles so I do not get blocked. Hassaan19 (talk) 09:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hassaan, you know the answer to that question already as you have been told repeatedly. Here is my advice to you:


 * 1) Step back from article creation
 * 2) Stop wasting people's time with attention-seeking talk page posts both here and on article talk
 * 3) Read and understand the notability requirements and in particular WP:MUSIC
 * 4) Read and understand Wikipedia's other core guidelines and policies, a good place to start would be WP:FIVE
 * 5) Apply what you have learned in points 3 & 4 to improving existing articles
 * You might also consider cleaning up your user-page so that it doesn't give the impression that you think that creating articles which have subsequently had to be deleted is some kind of badge of honour. Nancy  talk  09:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Hassaan19! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Tianna Webster -

Articles for deletion nomination of Tianna Webster
I have nominated Tianna Webster, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Tianna Webster. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nancy talk  15:14, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Connor Panayi
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Connor Panayi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Featured article candidates/Joe McElderry/archive1
I strongly advise you to withdraw this nomination. The article, frankly, is nowhere near FA quality. The lead is very short, the article does not appear to be comprehensive, there are unformatted citations, and there citation needed tags in the article. Compare this article to FA-quality articles. You might consider first working the article up through peer review and good article candidacy to prepare for its FAC nomination. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Dabomb87. It wouldn't pass for GA at the moment, let alone FA. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hassaan19, please utilize the peer review, or possibly Good article processes, and familiarize youself with the FAC process and standards before nominating more articles at FAC. I appreciate your efforts, but removing premature noms costs other editors a lot of time and work.  There had already been a discussion on the talk page of the article that it wasn't ready for FAC, but you nommed it without consulting other contributors; please refrain from premature noms in the future.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 23:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

re. recording contract petition entries
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

The references you have applied relating to online petitions - particularly as it was you who created the petitions in the first place - are not notable enough to include in this article. If one of them were to result in a recording contract being awarded, then that may be something worthy of adding, but you shouldn't add them yourself. Regards, Lynbarn (talk) 19:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Also removed from Eoghan Quigg. I42 (talk) 20:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Best and Worst
Give me your opinions on the best (well-written, organised) and worst (no sources, no sense) articles that I have created. Hassaan19 (talk) 16:38, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Beenkeragh
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Beenkeragh, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://mountainviews.ie/mv/index.php?mtnindex=2. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippines Albums Chart
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Philippines Albums Chart, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bluemask (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippines singles chart
A tag has been placed on Philippines singles chart requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 07:25, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Hollie
I have nominated Hollie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Hollie. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. iBen 20:32, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Aidan Davis
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Aidan Davis. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Aidan Davis. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Hassan, I have supported keeping the Aidan Davis article, but  only  because the AfD is  based on the personal motivations and convictions of the nominator that  are not  connected with  Wikipedia, rather than  on clearly  defined infringements against  Wikipedia policy.  I do  nevertheless urge  you to  refrain  from creating  articles that  are likely  to be deleted - by  creating  them them  you  are not  only wasting your own time, but also a lot of time of the other editors who  have to  take part in  the deletion debates.

Olly Murs (singer)
Hello Hassaan. I am disappointed to have to raise this with you as I thought that we had agreed that you would not go creating any more article without consensus. There are two key points here:
 * 1) Whilst you did the right thing by going to Talk:List of The X Factor finalists (UK series 6) to test whether there was consensus for a standalone article, you then proceeded to create regardless even though it had been clearly pointed out that the notability requirement set out at WP:MUSIC has not yet been met.
 * 2) It is not appropriate to create an article with the sole intention of it being sent to WP:AFD. This is pure and simple disruption and serves no purpose whatsoever.

You have been blocked before for taking unilateral decisions and attempting to over-ride consensus and accepted policy and if you carry on you will be blocked again. I do believe that your intentions are good but you have to understand that if consensus is in opposition to your personal opinion then consensus wins. Every time. Kind regards, Nancy  talk  17:17, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Holliecover.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Holliecover.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Nancy talk  22:27, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:EdelweissHollieSteel.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:EdelweissHollieSteel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:27, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chloe Hickinbottom


A tag has been placed on Chloe Hickinbottom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bazonka (talk) 16:26, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Connor Panayi


The article Connor Panayi has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 19:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Final warning
Hassan, what's going on? I thought we had reached an understanding that you would not create articles about people who clearly do not meet the notability guidelines. You even said on the talk page "I understand she isn't notable yet". I know that Britain's Got Talent started again last night so let's us just be clear that you are on your absolute last chance. Create one more dubious article and you will be blocked until well after the series has finished. Nancy talk  04:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I understand. I created the article in case, because Chloe has been featured in the news a lot over the last few days and is one of the favorites to win. This is similar to what happened with Susan Boyle last year, and she had an article by this time. Tobias Meed, a breakdancer, has independent notability by reaching the final of another reality show in 2008. Here is the source: http://entertainment.stv.tv/tv/170964-britains-got-talent-dancer-has-reality-tv-show-past/. Kieran Gaffney, a 13-year-old drummer, has come back after failing to make the semi-finals but still hasn't done anything outside of the series. One of these must deserve articles, and I will be happy to create them if they meet the notability guidelines. Hassaan19 (talk) 11:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * You might want to look to see whether WP:INCUBATE would be useful to you (ask at Wikipedia_talk:Article_Incubator if you are not sure). As for the article subject - bear in mind that BGT has a huge publicity effort behind it and of course they are putting out teasers about forthcoming contestants; becoming notable independently of the programme before it ends is somewhat exceptional. Susan Boyle achieved it but we can't assume it will happen again, and we certainly don't speculate. You could also consider building List_of_Britain's_Got_Talent_finalists_(series_4) when the finalists are known; consensus seems to be that such articles are fine, even if separate articles would not be. I42 (talk) 12:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Can I also make a suggestion? If you want to start articles on people you think may become notable in the future, why not create the pages in your own userspace where you can work on them, and then move the pages into the main space when notability has been established? For example, User:Hassaan19/Chloe Hickinbottom. anemoneprojectors   talk  12:40, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I have created the 'article incubator' article, but I need an administrator to look at it and see if it is fit for Wikipedia. Hassaan19 (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)


 * WP:1E provides your answer - as of now she has no independent notability. What you have started will be useful if she attains it, but of course an encyclopaedic article would require (referenced) information about her; her performance (which is all there is at the moment) is mostly incidental. I42 (talk) 19:07, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Chloe-hickinbottom-215x300.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Chloe-hickinbottom-215x300.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 07:51, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Nancy talk  03:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC) Hassaan, I have lost count of the number of times that I and other editors have spoken to you about creating articles about people who do not meet the notability guidelines and you have been blocked on several previous occasions for the same thing. Most recently I posted here on the 18 April regarding Chloe Hickinbottom and yet a few days later you do this. Not only did you recreate the article without any consensus to do so but you are also adding to the disruption by creating an article with the sole intention of sending it to AFD which is another thing you have been warned against doing. When we last spoke I made it clear that you were on a final warning and that an extended block would be the next step should you decide to continue to edit by your own rules. I have therefore blocked you for 2 months; consider yourself lucky that it was not indefinite. I have also blocked your IP address, 82.36.17.10, for a corresponding period.

I am sad that it has come to this again but it appears that blocking is the only way to make you stop. Nancy talk  03:52, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Kieran Gaffney
Did you mean to create Kieran Gaffney in your userspace? Anemone Projectors  20:20, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kieran Gaffney


The article Kieran Gaffney has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. I42 (talk) 10:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Harry Mondryk, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. ''You have just ended a 2-month ban for repeatedly creating articles on non-notable talent show contestants and the first thing you did on your return was create two new articles on non-notable talent show contestants. '' I42 (talk) 10:27, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Harry Mondryk
I have nominated Harry Mondryk, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Harry Mondryk. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I42 (talk) 10:33, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
Enough is enough. I indicated at the time of your last block that you were lucky it was not indefinite. You now return and with your very first edit you create another article about a failed talent show contestant. You then followed it with Kieran Gaffney, who again you know form previous conversations does not meet the notability requirement, to compound the problem it is also a biography of a living person with no references whatsoever. This is enough to indicate to me that the only way to stop your continued disruption is to block you again; this time I'm afraid it is indefinite. You may of course appeal this block in the usual way by adding the text below. Nancy talk  12:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jessica Hammond


The article Jessica Hammond has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * the object is not notable. She certainly must not be described as "truly destined for Musical Stardom" like her mom or little friend wrote it. Nobody cares what she is doing for her A-Levels. I understand we must not throw the baby out with the bathwater yet I cannot find a redeeming point. The sources as far as I see are minor/local, not credible

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eugene-elgato (talk) 13:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hollie Steel songs


A tag has been placed on Category:Hollie Steel songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)