User talk:Hassan261

January 2017
The article STUDENT INDUSTRIAL WORK EXPERIENCE SCHEME NIGERIA has been deleted, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion. The immediate reason for that is that the article was promotional in character, but I think it only fair to let you know that there were other respects in which the article would not have been acceptable, so that you don't put further work into creating articles with the same problems, only to see your work deleted.

Wikipedia does not host prospectuses or pages telling prospective students what they need to know about courses they may consider enrolling for. That job is done instead by pages on the web sites of the respective educational institutions.

There was no evidence in the article that the scheme satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines, so I searched for information about it, to see whether I could provide evidence that it does. Unfortunately, what I found convinced me that the scheme does not satisfy those guidelines, and if it doesn't then any work put into creating an article about it is likely to be wasted, as the article will be liable to deletion. No amount of editing or rewriting an article can change the notability of the subject of the article.

Although it is not a reason for deletion, it is likely to be helpful to you to know that Wikipedia does not normally use ALL CAPITALS, either in article titles of articles or in the content of articles.

My advice to new editors is that it is best to start by making small improvements to existing articles, rather than creating new articles. That way any mistakes you make will be small ones, and you won't have the discouraging experience of repeatedly seeing hours of work deleted. Gradually, you will get to learn how Wikipedia works, and after a while you will know enough about what is acceptable to be able to write whole new articles without fear that they will be deleted. Over the years I have found that editors who start by making small changes to existing articles and work up from there have a far better chance of having a successful time here than those who jump right into creating new articles from the start. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)