User talk:Hassanfroq

December 2015
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

I noticed your recent edit to Scaly-breasted munia does not have an edit summary.&#32;In general, your edits seem to have poor formatting and grammar and punctuation, and you are not providing edit summaries to explain why you are making the changes.

Edit summary content is visible in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! —BarrelProof (talk) 18:39, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Allthefoxes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Red turtle dove, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --allthefoxes (Talk) 18:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * That same comment applies to your edit of Indian silverbill. I didn't revert that one, but someone else might. Editing Wikipedia based on personal experience, without citing published reliable sources, is not really proper. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)