User talk:Hassani2023

GloCha moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, GloCha, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 13:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

Despite the request to submit for review, it seems that the item has been returned to mainspace without completing the WP:AFC process. The references do not indicate that WP:NORG can be complied with and to avoid 'move-warring' it is possible that the item will be proposed for deletion. Eagleash (talk) 21:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Hassani2023. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page GloCha, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hi Hassani2023! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:54, 30 March 2023 (UTC)



Hello, Hassani2023. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page GloCha has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are  unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. '''That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. ''' Please see this page on citing sources and Common sourcing mistakes (notability). This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat. The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

New article creation can be difficult and frustrating. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Correlogram. Adding your own papers is inappropriate. Star   Mississippi  21:43, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @Hassani2023: you have been warned already by not to spam articles with your own papers and external links, like you did (again) at Correlogram. I have reverted your edit. Wikipedia is not a platform for your self-promotion. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GloCha


A tag has been placed on GloCha, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Please do not even consider using your "Do you know who I am?" footer when disputing a deletion proposal, or at another time. First we do not, second, we are not interested.
 * You created an advert for something you have not proven to be notable in a Wikipedia sense. As a "top scientist" you should probably do your research on what is acceptable here and what is not. This is not. Please do better. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:49, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hassani2023/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hassani2023/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Star_Mississippi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hassani2023/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star  Mississippi  19:07, 30 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much indeed for your comments and suggestions.
 * Please could you guide which part should I remove or edit.
 * I greatly appreciate your support.
 * Kind regards Hassani2023 (talk) 19:27, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * almost nothing under mission or impact belongs, and there should be no external links in the body. We need more about what people say about the org, not what it says about itself. Star   Mississippi  21:41, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for your great suggestions.
 * This is to kindly inform you that I have further edited the page. Please could you kindly check and let me know if I need to change anything further.
 * Again, much appreciated. Hassani2023 (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * That's great. PLease re-submit it and an AFC reviewer will be along Star   Mississippi  22:12, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Good Day,
 * Thank you for your message and constructive feedback, which has helped improve the page. I would like to inform you that I have resubmitted the revised text for review. Thank you for your time and consideration. Hassani2023 (talk) 05:42, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * and I see you have created this article multiple times. Please be mindful of WP:PAID and WP:COI. Star   Mississippi  21:42, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: GloCha (March 31)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:GloCha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:GloCha Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:GloCha reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for your quick and speedy review. I will work on what you kindly suggested and improve the text.
 * Thanks again for your feedback Hassani2023 (talk) 06:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Just to be clear, it's not "improv[ing] the text" that is needed, but rather improving the referencing, so that on one hand it supports the information better, and on the other establishes that the subject is notable in Wikipedia terms.
 * But before you do any of that, you should respond to the conflict-of-interest (COI) query I posted here yesterday; see 'Managing a conflict of interest' above. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 * PS: Oh, and you cannot copypaste content from other sources, unless they expressly allow this with a Creative Commons licence compatible with Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:54, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:GloCha
Hello, Hassani2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GloCha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:GloCha


Hello, Hassani2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "GloCha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)