User talk:Hassenpheffer

Speedy deletion nomination of Darkside NYC
Hello Hassenpheffer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Darkside NYC for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Tutelary (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Darkside NYC
Hi there,

I did not delete your article, as your subject does indicate the significance of the group. However, this does not mean that they meet our criteria for notability and as such may be deleted at a later time. The article requires some reliable sources to verify claims made in the article.

As a second note, please sign your entries with 4 tildes ( ~ <- that character) as that allows people to quickly identify you and speak to you on your talk page. Discussion is key!

I hope you can work on your article, and happy editing! PanydThe muffin is not subtle 14:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Darkside NYC


The article Darkside NYC has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:GNG, doesn't appear to have met significant and reliably sourced coverage of said band.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutelary (talk) 14:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)