User talk:Hassocks5489/Archives/2009/January

Hwanbyeokdang
I'm not sure why you reject the entry of Hwanbyeokdang for the reason that it is marked as "stub". In that case, reviewers simply removed the template if the article pass the minimum requirement. Besides, the previous reviewer already said it over 1600 characters. I would like you to retract the decline mark. Thanks.--Caspian blue 19:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for verifying the article. I should've removed the template before nominating it, but totally forgot. With your effort and time, the article was successfully featured on the main age. Thanks a lot.--Caspian blue 07:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for St Michael and All Angels Church, Lowfield Heath
--Dravecky (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Lowfield Heath
--Dravecky (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Patrie (airship)
--Dravecky (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

New version of Interstate 15 in Arizona
Hi! Thanks for your initial review of Interstate 15 in Arizona.ogg. I've since re-recorded the article, reading out the complete exit list as you suggested. I've also improved the sound quality (notably making it sound less "tinny"), added additional information to the "closing credits" and imparted a more conversational style &mdash; techniques I developed during my (continuing) work on Greek mythology.

I've posted a new review request on WPSW, so if you have a chance to review the new recording, it'll be much appreciated. Cheers!

– Tonyle (talk • contribs) 17:43, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Rufus R. Jones DYK nomination
Thanks for getting in touch. I went back and reassessed the article, so it is no longer shown as stub-class. I guess I forgot to do that when I added the information before. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK query?
Oh nooo... ;( does that mean I would have lost the record (if there was one) or does it no longer count as fourteen? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 12:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? Someone said the record was eleven... I couldn't locate any page that went into detail on it... I'm not entirely sure there is one but I thought I'd seen one around before... if so it doesn't appear to be included with the other stats... or does such an achievement just get passed around like some sort of legend or folk tale? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 13:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I've broken the "By number of hooks by a single author (creator) in a single update" record if I understand it correctly. I had ten (divided into 9+1) in one go yesterday... do these records get updated by the reviewers or do I fill it in myself? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 19:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you (and for providing the links as well). :) --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 00:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK query?
Oh nooo... ;( does that mean I would have lost the record (if there was one) or does it no longer count as fourteen? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 12:20, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? Someone said the record was eleven... I couldn't locate any page that went into detail on it... I'm not entirely sure there is one but I thought I'd seen one around before... if so it doesn't appear to be included with the other stats... or does such an achievement just get passed around like some sort of legend or folk tale? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 13:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I think I've broken the "By number of hooks by a single author (creator) in a single update" record if I understand it correctly. I had ten (divided into 9+1) in one go yesterday... do these records get updated by the reviewers or do I fill it in myself? --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 19:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you (and for providing the links as well). :) --➨♀♂ Candlewicke STundefined 00:09, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Charlwood Park
Hello! Firstly, let me just say what great work you've done on Crawley articles over the last year or so. Sorry I've not been much help; work has more than taken over sadly! Just wanted to run my thoughts about Charlwood Park past you. I notice you've commented on the moving of the county boundary in 1974, but I think you may have things the wrong way round. My understanding is that the building was originally in Surrey, but that when Gatwick was moved into the Crawley borough by the Local Government Act 1972, Charlwood Park was part of that move, enacted in 1974. The Charlwood and Horley Act 1974 actually only served to stop some portions of Surrey being moved into Sussex rather than actually moving any the other way. I don't think Charlwood Park was ever actually moved back, since it seems that it was south of the Charlwood Road which is an area still in the Crawley boundary, but razed to provide room for the building of the North Terminal in the 80s. Does that contradict something you'd found? Tafkam (talk) 21:28, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi

 * Just a 'Hallo' from another Hassocks resident, nice to know there's more than one of us! Paste  Let’s have a chat. 22:11, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

The missing queue
Thanks for sorting out the problematic queue at DYK yesterday. Hassocks 5489 (tickets please!)  13:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're welcome, Hassocks. Glad that I could help.  Take care. --PFHLai (talk) 15:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Ifield Water Mill
Great article! A couple of comments though, would the article be better titled as Ifield Watermill (similar style to Rolvenden Windmill and others). Also, I think the article would benefit from a description of the machinery in a similar way to Draper's Mill, Margate and other windmill articles. Mjroots (talk) 15:56, 6 February 2009 (UTC)