User talk:Hassocks5489/Archives/2011/January

My Brighton and Hove
Hi, I've got the Somerhill House article at GAN, and the question of the use of the My Brighton and Hove website as a ref has been raised. I believe this website is generally reliable. As Wikipedia's resident expert on B&H, would you please comment at Talk:Somerhill House/GA1 re this source. Mjroots (talk) 20:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your help, and good to see you are familiar with sfn and its useage. Mjroots (talk) 21:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Article now a GA! Mjroots (talk) 12:19, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Jamaica Inn
Hi, sorry about the nominations of the railcards. I was wondering if you have anything on the Jamaica Inn. I know its rather more west than your usual area of focus but it is such a famous inn I wondered if it was covered in any of your books?♦ Dr. Blofeld  15:14, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

FLC comments
Thanks for your comments on my current nomination for FLC. Before I deal with them, a query. I had always thought that the obsolete grades A, B and C corresponded to the current grades I, II* and II, and I am sure(?) that I have seen this somewhere. But search as I have, I cannot find it. So rather than suffer the wrath of FLC reviewers, I played for "safety" and left the cell uncoloured (although I did sort B with II*). What I really want is a reference to say that A is equivalent to I, etc. Do you have this? If it's there (somewhere) I could use it and make life easy (including colouring the cell, which is no problem). I fear that if I colour the cell, as you suggest (and as I have done elsewhere when it's not a FLC), some "clever" reviewer will cause difficulty. Hope you are having a good Christmas. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:48, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ICR Laguna Seca.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ICR Laguna Seca.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:ICR Replay TV1.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ICR Replay TV1.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Church of the Holy Sepulchre, Warminghurst
The DYK project (nominate) 20:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Images to Commons
Hi Hassocks5489, I noticed you have a nice collection of images here. I'm moving them to Commons so that the images can also be used on other Wikipedia's. multichill (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. Thanks for that; I've been meaning to do it for a while but have never got round to it.  I don't know if it makes any difference for the upload templates when you move them across to Commons, but I have an account there with a different user name: The Voice of Hassocks.  Cheers,  Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  17:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The uploads just link back to this account, see for example Commons:File:Stonehaven Railway Station 03.JPG. If you do Special:MergeAccount this account will work on Commons too (and all Wikimedia sites). That makes everything a lot easier!
 * multichill (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ps. Please keep conversations in one place

Another FLC
Just to let you know that List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England has been nominated at FLC. Happy New Year. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for St Mary the Virgin's Church, North Stoke
–Grondemar 23:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Round Hill, Brighton
The DYK project (nominate) 00:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Roundhill Crescent
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Talk:All Saints Church, Patcham/GA1
Although you aren't the GA nominator, I have started the review for this article, so you may be interested in watching this page for the duration of the review. Thank you, / ƒETCH COMMS  /  19:55, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors
I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 21:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note. I would be willing to consider this next year if the program continues, but at present I would struggle with the time commitment, unfortunately.   Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  13:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

FL promoted
Thanks for your support at FLC for List of churches preserved by the Churches Conservation Trust in Northern England which has just been promoted. Now working on the East of England, the biggest list, with plenty of red links still to sort. Cheers. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 10:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Admin
Hi, I notice that you are not an Admin. Would you be interested in running? I feel that you have the ability to be an admin, and your content creation and editing would be a point in your favour at RfA should you be willing to run. Mjroots (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I would support this. -  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 14:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your note Mj (and Neutralhomer). I have been asked a few times before, most recently about 9 months ago, but for several reasons I have never wished to take on the extra tools.  Some are given here, and I would add that I would prefer to keep my focus on article-writing and building.  I have an ever-growing list of articles I "need" to research and write, some of which are very extensive topics and require a lot of work.  With an increasingly busy and varied range of things going on in "real life" as well, I feel I would not have enough time to do justice to learning and performing admin tasks correctly while keeping up my research and writing interests; and both would undoubtedly suffer.  Nevertheless, I will never rule anything out in the future.  Cheers,  Hassocks  5489 (tickets please!)  13:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That's cool and I respect that. If you ever wish to make the jump to admin, please do let me know and I will be glad to be a co-nom on the nomination. :)  Also, if any of the articles you are working on are Virginia related, please let me or another WP:VIRGINIA member know and we will be glad to help. :)  Take Care... Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 23:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. I too was worried that becoming an admin would impinge on article creation and writing generally, but it hasn't had too much of an impact. My recent slow-down in article creation is due to other factors not related to being an admin. How much (or little) admin work one does is purely a matter of choice, although I do find it useful to be able to step in and block IPs who are clearly not here to improve things. As Neutralhomer said, should you decide to run, do let me know. Mjroots (talk) 09:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)