User talk:Hassocks5489/Archives/2013/August

DYK RfC

 * As a listed DYK participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat&#124;Contributions 00:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of places of worship in Mole Valley
Alex Shih(talk) 08:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Providence Chapel, Charlwood
Alex Shih(talk) 08:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Providence Chapel, Charlwood
A very nice little article, but that infobox overwhelms it. Have you considered partially collapsing it? Eric  Corbett  12:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Astoria Theatre, Brighton
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Goodwyns
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

The George Hotel, Crawley
I was thinking of gunning for FA with this. What do you think? Can you add anything more?♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  18:59, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Sounds good, we'll wait two months then. Hope you are well!♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  12:22, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Royal Pavilion Tavern
Alex ShihTalk 15:47, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Providence Chapel, Charlwood
I don't believe the ref you just added supports the contention in the sentence "As of 2024 the former chapel is for sale." The use of the current year template means that it is intended to be left in place into the future, 2014, 2015, etc. The ref provided only supports the claim that at the time the listing was placed the chapel was for sale. Changing it to "As of 2013 the former chapel was for sale." would rectify that. Personally I believe that should be in a separate trailing para and should probably read "As of 2013 the property was for sale.". As an aside, I understand that the property has been sold for a nominal sum to a new group of local trustees.not a great ref - just an indication that there are new trustees. Atlas-maker (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm pretty sure that there isn't anything in the local rags at the moment. The transfer of ownership may not have been completed yet, according to my sources, although in practical terms responsibility has passed from the original, rather remote, trustees to the local group. I'll keep an eye out too. Atlas-maker (talk) 13:34, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Grade I listed buildings in West Sussex
Hi Hassocks, I've prepared a different version of the West Sussex list linked above to sync up with the Wiki Loves Monuments tools. It can be seen here: User:Nev1/GradeIWSussex

If it's ok with you, I'd like to move the article into the mainspace. If you want changes made first, do let me know and I'll do my best to sort it out (it is a bit devoid of pictures at the moment). Nev1 (talk) 14:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I've added a reference column, so we can copy over the references from the current article. A notes column could be added to include information on current use, what do you reckon? Nev1 (talk) 11:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments
Hi Hassocks, you've probably seen the lists of listed buildings springing up all over the place thanks to the hard work of Nev1. Most of them are in need of a little TLC (things like links for buildings which have articles, images where we have them, date sorting and consistency of date format). If you could help out with any of the lists, it would really be appreciated—we're hoping to have them all ready for 1 September for the start of Wiki Loves Monuments, which leaves quite a lot of polishing to do and not very much time! Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  12:39, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead
Hello! Your submission of List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! AbstractIllusions (talk) 02:27, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

DYK for List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of places of worship in Reigate and Banstead until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:30, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * In my opinion, the list is well prepared and well referenced. My only concern is that so few of the buildings are actually covered by individual articles. I realize, though, that this is also the case with many similar lists. I have commented further on the AfD discussion page. Keep up the excellent work!--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=570297771 your edit] to Grade I listed buildings in West Sussex may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grade I listed buildings in West Sussex, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)