User talk:Hastyr15

Welcome!
Hi Hastyr15! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 22:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Asclepius
Hi again Hastyr15! I see that you are creating an article about the Asclepius in your User:Hastyr15/sandbox. I wish to alert you to the existence of our Hermetica article, which contains a very short section on the Asclepius (see Hermetica). Its Hermetica may also be of interest (note the standard critical edition of the Asclepius by Nock & Festugière 1945–1954). The section called Hermetica also briefly refers to the extant Coptic fragments. Adding references to these editions in your article will be good to establish the notability of the subject.

It may also be a good idea to move (rename) your sandbox to Draft:Asclepius (Hermetic treatise) (on drafts, see Drafts). The Asclepius article is about the god himself, and currently redirects to Hermetica, so it will be best to move your article to  when it is finished. You will only be able to do this when your account is four days old, but if you wish I will do it for you. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 22:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Thank you for all the useful advice! Feel free to move the article to Asclepius (Hermetic treatise). I am very new to this and if you have any more advice or critiques of my contributions I would appreciate it. Hastyr15 (talk) 23:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I moved it to Draft:Asclepius (treatise) and expanded it a little. To be on the safe side with respect to notability (which is beyond doubt here for anyone familiar with the subject, but which is the main criterion that needs to be objectively established for the reviewer to accept it), I added a bunch of sources to the bibliography. These can also be used to expand the article.
 * Just as a quick note for now, 'Hermetic' is usually capitalized on Wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. I'm looking forward to your contributions! ☿  Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 03:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: User:Hastyr15/sandbox has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Hastyr15/sandbox. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asclepius (treatise) has been accepted
 Asclepius (treatise), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Asclepius_(treatise) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The draft was initially declined, but then accepted by the reviewer after this conversation about in on their talk page.

The comment Mattdaviesfsic left at their initial review was:

The draft has now been accepted because the notability of the subject is demonstrated and the article meets very basic requirements such as citing reliable sources for its claims (except for the one paragraph still needing a citation). However, it is still a stub, and it would be great if you would expand it a little as suggested by the reviewer. If you ever have any questions, please feel free to ask them at my talk page. I may also be able to provide you with more sources if needed. Thanks, and happy editing! ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 16:57, 9 January 2023 (UTC)