User talk:Haverly999

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Jac 16888 Talk 00:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Michael J. Franklin (CPO)


The article Michael J. Franklin (CPO) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jac 16888 Talk 00:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Michael J. Franklin (CPO)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Michael J. Franklin (CPO) meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Michael J. Franklin (CPO). Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. JNW (talk) 21:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Judson012 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. AussieLegend (talk) 00:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
__NOINDEX__  E lockid  ( Talk ) 11:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello Editors,

My name is Michael J. Franklin and I have stood back and dispassionately watched in horror what exchanges and communications that have taken place in an attempt to have the article “Michael J. Franklin (CPO)” entered into Wikipedia’s database. I thank you for your comments and observations. I have a problem that I would now like to tell you about. When the idea of the article inclusion was first suggested to me. I wasn’t in favor of it for many reasons. The people who wanted to submit the article don’t speak English as their mother tongue and I’m of the opinion that having anything added to the database is extremely difficult and complicated. I wasn’t prepared to have to defend myself from what appears to be happening. This isn’t directed at anyone in particular but is how I’m feeling at the moment.

To be more specific, there are more than 2 people working or have worked on the project, the first “judson012” a Mrs. Irmgard Walter and “Haverly999” Mrs. Maike Rogge, these are two separate and wonderful people whose intentions were in the right place. However, they experienced a myriad of problems by not really understanding the rules. The one editor’s comment that the two are the same person and a conflict of interest might exist…baffles them and quite frankly me as well. It seemed whatever they tried it backfired. The people working on this project are honest and forthright individuals. They are trying to add an article they feel is worthy and aren’t trying to sell anything. The facts that they have presented to date can be supported, although, they have discovered that attaching anything is hard. At the moment there seems to be a degree of resignation on their part. This saddens me. They were advised by you (the editors) that references were required. It made me feel good to know that they had to include at least one 3rd party independent source. They thought that they had…only to receive other confusing and frustrating comments on the “talk” page. They then added book references that met with the same confusing and frustrating comments. I find the above comments way over the top and therefore request that you delete this article at your first possible opportunity. It appears that there are other factors at work here. Many of the people I’ve protected have themselves stated reservations about Wikipedia and its practices. I now think that they may be right.

With kindest regards to you all Mike Franklin —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.81.178.23 (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)


 * What is your explanation of this edit where someone using the account Judson012 signs himself Haverly999? JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)