User talk:HavocPlayz

August 2021
Hello, I'm EN-Jungwon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fagradalsfjall, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. EN - Jungwon  16:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey
Hey, its Solar. How's your day? What's going on? - Solar r r r...   Send a message to Solar? Tappy tap tap! ⏰Time: 12:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Hey, My day is fine. just chilling prior to my multi hour school day-'''Havocplayz

Just to note...
... from your recent edit summary in the 2021 Pacific typhoon season, we change to the current infobox when the JMA begins issuing advisories. We do not need to wait until it's a tropical storm. Kind regards :) Typhoon2013  (talk) 21:22, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

i don't normally do the west pacific articles but since there is nothing in the east pacific nor the atlantic i shifted gears a bit HavocPlayz (talk)

Please explain...
... about your edit of reverting me in the 2021 Pacific typhoon season when I updated Rai's TC information for 21Z? I reverted your move. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Actually I now understood why you did that. But please do not revert next time? I accidentally placed 120kts for the 1-min sustained winds where it's suppose to be for the wind gusts. You can just switch the numbers instead of reverting. Please note this next time. Kind regards, Typhoon2013  (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

It was easier reverting it prior but a quick tip is double check the numbers just before publishing the update HavocPlayz (talk)

Tornado report.
Hi, I reverted your edit at List of United States tornadoes in May 2022 because you stated that a tornado occurred, but you did not provide a Reliable source or add it to the table. I found a statement by the National Weather Service indicating a possible tornado, but I have not found any statements from the NWS confirming it or giving a definitive rating. Can you provide a link to where you got this information? We also generally don't add tornadoes to the totals until they are included in the tables. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors
Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. Noah Talk 03:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Elijahandskip (talk) 22:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Your recent editing history at Tornado outbreak of March 24–25, 2023 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. wxtrackercody (talk · contributions) 22:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Missing information
I think you are missing a piece of information. The Damage Assessment Toolkit is used by the National Weather Service’s local forecast offices as a way to tell the public and partners about preliminary information. This document right here explains in Section 47.5 that and I will quote:


 * 47.5 “On-site Inspections (Surveys). WFO tornado/waterspout and extreme downburst damage surveys are desirable in those cases when the MIC or WCM believes additional information is needed for Storm Data preparation. A survey should be completed as soon as possible before clean-up operations remove too much damage evidence.

The NWS has developed the Damage Assessment Toolkit (DAT) to assist with the collection of storm damage survey information. The DAT is a Geographic Information System (GIS) application designed for efficient collection, analysis, and delivery of storm damage data. The toolkit is built around a central geospatial database, which is used to store the data. To ensure accurate tornado paths are recorded, WFOs should use the DAT to collect storm damage survey information. More information on the DAT is located at: https://sites.google.com/a/noaa.gov/damage-assessment-toolkit/.”

So please, just stop with the “WFO needs to say it”, because the WFO did add that EF2 damage point. Elijahandskip (talk) 22:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)