User talk:Havoksf

Your changes to Havok (software) were in violation of Wikipedia's policies. Please read Wikipedia is not a soapbox for more information. Benandorsqueaks 22:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

I concur with Benandorsqueaks on this one - blatent advertising content is definitely not permitted here. But in any case, you were writing about Havok-the-company and the article is about Havok-the-physics-software-library - as clearly explained in the first sentence of the article....in boldface for chrissakes! If it were appropriate to write about Havok-the-company then the right thing to do would be to create another article about that subject (calling it 'Havok (software company)' or something). Even so, it is not correct to write "We do such and such" because this is Wikipedia - not a Havok advert! "We" in this context would mean "We - the authors of this encyclopedia" - and in good encyclopeadic fashion, we never refer to ourselves. SteveBaker 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Also, if you really represent Havok, check out Conflict of interest Nil Einne 12:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Havoklogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Havoklogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)