User talk:Hawk6789

Speedy deletion nomination of Penny Billgard
Hello Hawk6789,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Penny Billgard for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Zazzysa (talk) 10:52, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Penny Billgard


The article Penny Billgard has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. —  IVORK  Discuss 14:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Penny Billgard
Hello, Hawk6789,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Penny Billgard should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Penny Billgard.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Zazzysa (talk) 14:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of child prodigies. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . Warnings had previously been given at User talk:223.230.32.10. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)