User talk:HawkEggz

Paid editing
Hi Under Wikipedia Terms of Use any editor who is being paid to write or update an article, must confirm that they are a paid editor per WP:PAID and WP:DISCLOSURE. Any editor who is being paid and doesn't disclose risks indefinite blocking.  scope_creep Talk  10:41, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi the disclosure was already made on my user page in Nov 2015. Is there an issue with that now? -- HawkEggz (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry It is usually a paid silver template I was looking for. I never saw it. Thanks.   scope_creep Talk  09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * by the way, are there issues with Apical Group? I've updated with third party citations after feedback from other contributors. Been trying to clean up the old PR language. Flagging it for deletion is a little over-the-top, no? Thanks! -- HawkEggz (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Apical Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Apical Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Apical Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  10:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * @ scope_creep : What are the grounds for deletion specific to the page? There have been third party sources added. Thanks. -- HawkEggz.
 * I thought it was promotional, but it looks a solid keep.  scope_creep Talk  15:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, am trying to clean up the promotional language and provide factual content are backed by references, as you can see in the edits. So will a "solid keep" still warrant a flag for deletion? Thanks HawkEggz (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, looks like the "solid keep" got deleted. Any recourse? HawkEggz (talk) 04:41, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Edit Requests
Hi The content your adding seems to be designed to promote. These articles should offset discuss company events and processes that are notable, not fast post branding info off the wire that is promotional. I would suggest using Edit requests to request an update to an article. It is standard way of doing it as the whole lot needs more scrutiny. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  02:14, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Paid Template
Hi There is a template called Template:Paid which is usually filled in by paid editors. Can you full it in please, so other editors can see that your paid, and bung it at the top of your user page. It used to drive the category system, process and WP software apparently. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  15:18, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Four tildes like ~ will give you a signature. Best wishes.  scope_creep Talk  15:21, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Edit Requests
Hi No it will possibly be kept. Can you start using Edit requests to request an update to an article.  scope_creep Talk  09:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Apical Group for deletion
Hi Not really. You can request a deletion review at Deletion review.  scope_creep Talk  07:28, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Apical Group (July 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apical Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Apical Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Apical_Group Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lapablo&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Apical_Group reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 07:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Apical Group


Hello, HawkEggz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apical Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)