User talk:Hawkers994

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Contentious topic notice: Horn of Africa
You have recently made edits related to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes). This is a standard message to inform you that the Horn of Africa is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. signed,Rosguill talk 01:56, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MathAfrique (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (2023 Las Anod conflict) for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:49, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

(formal notification: I have mentioned the edit war at WP:NPOVN, but the discussion should probably continue at Talk:2023 Las Anod conflict, not on the noticeboard.) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:05, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MustafaO (talk) 14:02, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Let us build concensus
Hi User:Hawkers994

Let's go back to before. You stop editing the Awdal page and you keep the Habr Awal page the way you see fit. Let us avoid getting arbitration involved. If this is ok, then I will delete the discussion. Let me know your thoughts. We wont agree so let us reverse all edits which i agreed to on the Habr Awal page.

MustafaO (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Why should sourced content be deleted because its not to your liking. Both content on both pages is the same. It wont make sense to keep one and delete one as its the same content. You do not get to pick and choose Hawkers994 (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Because there is no issue with the source. The source is absolutely fine. The issue is that the source isn't saying what you are reflecting in the content? Do you understand where the problem is? I don't think youve understood the crux of the dispute. Its not the source.
 * MustafaO (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your mind doesn’t seem to grasp that large number of different clans settle in this region as mentioned in the source, sources are used regardless of what you personally believe Hawkers994 (talk) 15:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Let us solve it here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

October 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Awdal) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:19, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring
If you continue to edit war at Awdal you will be indefinitely blocked from editing that article. You must discuss the changes on the talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2023 (UTC)


 * dispite engagement in talk user Abdihakimper refuses to discuss any of this as evident from his talk page User talk:Abdihakimper i was adding back the sourced content and him been blocked more than numerous times just for removing content without discussion or engagement. Hawkers994 (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * There has been nothing on the talk page of the article about this. Based on their history and total lack of communication I've indefinitely blocked them from the article. What needs to happen now is discussion on the talk page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:54, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
The RFC discussion came to a natural end. Given that non-biased commentators in the discussion who are not affiliated with the Somaliland project all agreed the source was dubious, I have proceeded to remove it. You should not revert edits without good reason, if you wish to understand my point in further detail please refer to comments in the talk page. Regards. Wadamarow (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. MustafaO (talk) 07:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)