User talk:Hawol

Getting Psychotherapy into This Week's Improvement Drive
Hi there! I noticed that you contribute a lot to Transpersonal psychology, and I thought you might care to help out the Psychotherapy article. As it stands this article could use a lot of help, and thus I've taken the liberty of trying to get it to be the focus of a week's improvement drive. All we need to get it for a week's worth of focus and improvement is enough votes, so go to Psychotherapy's vote page and help out this very needing article! JoeSmack (talk) 18:48, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Parapsychology Article Rewrite
Hi, I'm working on a rewrite of the parapsychology article in my Sandbox. I invite your input generally, and specifically on a small section I would like to include on transpersonal psychology's approaches to parapsychological topics. We'd appreciate your help. -- Annalisa Ventola (Talk 05:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

It's 7 years later, and we need to get in touch with the arbitration committee about revision. I would value your input. 69.14.156.143 (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello there. I've taken a look at the article and it seems very well-developed. The article on Transpersonal Psychology is under revision, and I hope to make some contributions to it in the time to come. I don't know if I have time to prepare a segment for The Parapsychology article in the immediate future, but I will be looking into the matter.--Hawol (talk) 11:09, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Question on Notability
I was very impressed with your contributions and comments on Transpersonal Psychology and wonder if you could advise me on helping an article I've created to meet Wiki's notability and documentation requirements. Karen Mehringer is a published author, public speaker, and licensed therapist whose approach is based on TP. Would appreciate any comment and/or advice you can offer with regard to content, formatting, or documentation. Thanks! User:Namekal —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC).

Kundalini Yoga
Hello, I have noticed you have made multiple edits to the Kundalini Yoga. There are several problems. You tried to integrate newly added contents, however this contents is all from the same book and uses the same source and thus the same citation. There is no need for multiple citations. It is one book, 3 pages and I added short summary. Another thing is this: You can not mix Western views with original Hindu interpretations. Kundalini Yoga came from Hinduism and is part of a religion. In this sense, you have to leave the interpretation to those who produced it. It would be my suggestion to organize the article in three topics: Definition (according to Hindusim). History (according to yoga and Hinduism) and "Western expiriences".

Currently there are sources of high value and sources of no value mixed together in formless blend. I have undone your edits (temporarily), because you do not have the book sources used to add much of the quality original contents.

It is true however that the article is a mess and I have not yet found a way to properly link this together because the source quality varies so much and I dont want to excluded people and would like to keep as much as contents available in some form. Atmapuri (talk) 16:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

The new edits are better, however I would still rather see a Hindu Guru's making the definition, rather than some English scholar. There is still sourced and unsourced material mixed together. The "views" are also emphasized too much. In Yoga and Hindusim there are clear definitions for Kundalini, but you wont find many sources in the west because the techniques are not public and because recognized Hindu Gurus are not properly recognized as reliable sources on Hinduism in the west. Maybe a good way would be to take a look at the teachings of Paramhans Yogananda and his Kriya Yoga to find more confirmation and more cross reference.

Another thing is that there are psychiatric hospitals full of schizophrenic patients who tried this on their own. I think the warnings belong in the main header. If you make the article too neutral from that point of view, you could be contributing to such cases. (not to mention your own Karma)Atmapuri (talk) 06:30, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Jeffrey Long
Hi there, could you help me please at the Wikipedia article Jeffrey Long. They try to delete it here. I saw that you work on the subject near-death experience and have a lot of knowledge about that. Thank you. Wega14 (talk) 22:59, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answer on my user-page. I included the primary sources you gave me into the article, but I have problems to find the secondary sources, you suggested to include in the article. Wega14 (talk) 12:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Transpersonal sociology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transpersonal sociology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Transpersonal sociology& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Association for Transpersonal Psychology for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Association for Transpersonal Psychology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Association for Transpersonal Psychology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Xurizuri (talk) 02:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Missouri Medicine moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Missouri Medicine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's notability guideline for journals and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –– FormalDude  talk  02:10, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Missouri Medicine has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Missouri Medicine. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Missouri Medicine has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Missouri Medicine. Thanks! Randykitty (talk) 16:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Missouri Medicine has been accepted
 Missouri Medicine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Missouri_Medicine help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:39, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cogent Psychology (October 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Gusfriend were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cogent Psychology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cogent_Psychology Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gusfriend&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cogent_Psychology reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 23:51, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dead Sea Discoveries has been accepted
 Dead Sea Discoveries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Dead_Sea_Discoveries help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 21:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cogent Psychology
Hello, Hawol. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cogent Psychology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cogent Psychology


Hello, Hawol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cogent Psychology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)