User talk:Hayatgm

Welcome!

 * }

January 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shandur Top has been reverted. Your edit here to Shandur Top was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://alhayatgm.wordpress.com/shandur-polo-ground/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:43, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khukush Nallah


The article Khukush Nallah has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 05:37, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazyar I


A tag has been placed on Hazyar I requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 05:39, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mir Hayat II


A tag has been placed on Mir Hayat II requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 05:40, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mir Hayat Hakim


A tag has been placed on Mir Hayat Hakim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 05:42, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zumbul Hayat


A tag has been placed on Zumbul Hayat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 05:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Charvellu"
A page you created, Charvellu, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. —Josh3580talk/hist 05:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail
Hi, with regard to your edits at Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail, it is important that you please find reliable sources to support the information you are submitting, or I will have to nominate the article for deletion. We can't support articles that are entirely based on original research. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 06:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Lots of speedy deletions
Hi, you seem to be making lots of contributions that are classified as speedily deletable material. Please add some information about why these people are notable for encyclopedia in first place. Don't write articles about only locally or marginally important people first, it is much easier to practise editing here when your work is not in danger to be destroyed. The articles would benefit from sources too. jni (delete)...just not interested 07:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Status and Advice
I think many of these are actually sustainable, and ,as reviewing admin, I've declined some of these deletions. However, the article will not stay in WP without sources. You got the information from somewhere, so say where you got it. Ad the references at the very first edit--don;t eve start a article unless you have a reference in front of you. And when someone has a government office that does not obvious correspond to a well-known office in the English language, explain what it is.

If you continue this way, you will be wasting your efforts--and you will be depriving the readers of the encyclopedia of what might be useful articles.  DGG ( talk ) 08:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nallah Khukush


The article Nallah Khukush has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * unreferenced article making ethnic generalisations and claims about living people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:44, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 10 February
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=594884370 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F594884370%7CNiat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail%5D%5D Ask for help])

February 2014
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hazyar I


The article Hazyar I has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Google Books, Google Scholar and Google didn't show any reliable results about the people stated in this article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenticel ( talk ) 14:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mas Junali
Hello Hayatgm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mas Junali for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 00:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mas Junali
Hello, Hayatgm. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mas Junali, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 00:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Charvelu


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Charvelu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. RadioFan (talk) 02:12, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gurzain


A tag has been placed on Gurzain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. S M S Talk 21:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Javaid Hayat Kakakhail


A tag has been placed on Javaid Hayat Kakakhail, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. S M S Talk 21:41, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 30 April
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Javaid Hayat Kakakhail page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=606455284 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F606455284%7CJavaid Hayat Kakakhail%5D%5D Ask for help])

Nomination of Bulbul Hayat Kakakhail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bulbul Hayat Kakakhail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bulbul Hayat Kakakhail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 18:12, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm MelbourneStar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 13:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Javed Hayat Kakakhail


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Javed Hayat Kakakhail. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – John Milton. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at John Milton – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Richard Yin (talk) 17:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Javaid Hayat Kakakhail


A tag has been placed on Javaid Hayat Kakakhail requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Richard Yin (talk) 18:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Javaid Hayat Kakakhail. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Richard Yin (talk) 19:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Javaid Hayat Kakakhail. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Richard Yin (talk) 19:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Javaid Hayat Kakakhail. --Richard Yin (talk) 19:30, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Richard Yin (talk) 20:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 20:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Removing AfD template
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.— cyberbot I Notify Online 10:24, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Diff: Inappropriate removal of AfD template. Removing the template doesn't make the discussion go away. Participate in the discussion, or don't, but do not remove the template, please.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Javed Hayat Kakakhail
Hello, Hayatgm. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Javed Hayat Kakakhail, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Javed Hayat Kakakhail to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, ubiquity (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You are strongly encouraged to respond to the issues raised at ANI, as people who do not reply typically wind up blocked for disruptive editing. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Javed Hayat Kakakhail, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dreamland, Persian and Melancholy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Diff:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gurzain (Book)
Hello Hayatgm,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gurzain (Book) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. --Richard Yin (talk) 20:47, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''Diff: Improper removal of maintenance template. The issues with non-English words being included in the article have not been fully resolved. Removing templates without resolving the issues is now being considered disruptive editing.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Gurzain (Book). --Richard Yin (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Repeated removal of speedy templates on your articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ron h jones (Talk) 21:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mir Hayat Hakim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mir Hayat Hakim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mir Hayat Hakim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kinu t/c 17:41, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Devil Anse Hatfield
 * added links pointing to Randolph, Hatfield, Logan County, Church, Civil War and McCoys

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Devil Anse Hatfield, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kinu t/c 18:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding copyrighted material to articles. Changing the name and some small details in a copied article does not remove the copyright. Thank you. --Richard Yin (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Javed Hayat Kakakhail


The article Javed Hayat Kakakhail has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. --Richard Yin (talk) 15:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated recreation of deleted articles. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 16:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Most, if not all, of your contributions to date have been biographies of individuals who do not appear to meet notability guidelines, that are poorly sourced and unverifiable, and/or are copyright violations. Your creation of articles about people named "Hayat" is, on the surface, not a problem, but the repeated recreation of these articles suggests a conflict of interest and that you have no interest in contributing to this encyclopedia beyond the creation of this walled garden. Until such a time that you can convince the community that you understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, as linked above, I believe this block is necessary to prevent further disruption. -- Kinu  t/c 17:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Given your subsequent block evasion, consider the offer above rescinded. -- Kinu  t/c 19:56, 12 December 2014 (UTC)