User talk:Hayden120/Archive 3

Germanic languages map
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Germanic_languages_in_Europe.png Lguipontes (talk) 20:36, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Note at WikiProject Books
I saw your post at WikiProject Books Try to keep the summary to about 5 paragraphs. It is actually more about balance with the remainder of the article, more than number of paragraphs. There are some Featured and Good articles on non-fiction books on my userpage that you can look at as examples. From what I've read at Before the Dawn: Recovering the Lost History of Our Ancestors, the "Origin of humans and language" sub-section is getting rather excessive. You can describe what the chapter is about without explaining how the author got from point A to point B to point C. When you get to the point when you would like to go for the Good Article class, let me know and I will provide any help I can. maclean (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you. At this point I'm aiming for less than ten paragraphs, and I have cut back the "Origin of humans and language" section from four paragraphs to two. I'll do my best to condense the summary as I go. Thanks, I'll let you know! Hayden120 (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Before the Dawn review
I've begun the GA review for Before the Dawn. It looks strong to me so far, but I'd like your thoughts on a few points. Thanks for all your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much for reviewing the article! I've replied on the talk page. Hayden120 (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Great--I should be able to take a look tomorrow. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:45, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you, and thanks again for your excellent review! A barnstar for you on your talk page too. Hayden120 (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Before the Dawn: Recovering the Lost History of Our Ancestors
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks ! It's a very interesting book, and I definitely recommend it if you enjoyed the summary. Thanks again, Hayden120 (talk) 12:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I think it has FA potential. If you are interested in taking to FA at some point I'd be happy to help you.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  13:58, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you, that would be excellent! I'm slightly intimidated by the FA process; do you think the article would need to change at all/much to pass? Hayden120 (talk) 15:07, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, FA is gruelling, a lot of editors will throw everything at you and you'll find yourself bending over backwards on the most trivial of issues. However, it is very rewarding if you go through the process working with others and earn an FA at the end of it as so few articles make it. Mother India is my next FA nom. For FA it needs to be as comprehensive and widely sourced as possible, as I haven't researched the book I wouldn't know just how many sources are available but the coverage of the book is more than adequate. Perhaps for FA it would need a bit exploration and analysis of some of the issues discussed in the book from a scientific perspective, I'm not sure, but my own feeling is that this has potential for FA without too much further work and I'm usually right when I've taken articles to FA. I'll ask Tim riley what he thinks, it might be a good idea to peer review it to get some suggestions.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  10:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Excellent. I have scoured the internet for sources on Before the Dawn, and I believe that I have included all of the reliable ones available. Before the GA review, I originally included a bit of a background on the issues discussed in the book. The GA review found it to be a synthesis, though, which I think is true in retrospect. To write about issues in the book from a scientific perspective would require that the issues and the book be explicitly mentioned together in scientific sources. Since so few sources are available, it probably would not be feasible. Thanks, Hayden120 (talk) 10:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

I've spoken to Tim but he confesses to not be knowledgeable of scientific book FAs and feels it is probably best left at GA for now. However, in light of what you've said, and my own opinion of it and awareness of the standard of other books we have on here I'd say it would be worth opening a peer review and requesting wider input.♦ Dr. ☠ Blofeld  14:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Ah, okay. For now I'm quite happy with its GA status, but I'll consider opening a peer review when I'm less busy outside Wikipedia. Many thanks for the help, Hayden120 (talk) 04:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Swedish language topics


A tag has been placed on Template:Swedish language topics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Lfdder (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

GAR
--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 15:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=605709716 your edit] to Hydrogen economy may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)