User talk:Hayford Peirce/Archive 3

language desk/Dennett edit
hi, i asked here some questions that relate to your recent edit of Daniel Dennett. it is supposed to yield a general response, not to avoid a dialog, and i'll be happy to see you reply in either way. trespassers william 21:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Caps
Best thing I can suggest is check the Manual of Style. The way you describe it makes it sound as if this article is being written as an advertisement, which might also be grounds for not using the all-caps. In the media it varies from publication to publication. But I'm not aware of a specific rule. Regarding the "mad reverter" the anon (who still won't admit to being that registered user who left in a huff) has taken the radio links thing to the next level, starting a thread on the issue here. 23skidoo 01:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Wimbledon Courts From Air.jpg
You may want to take a look at this image you uploaded. It lacks source information, and a rationale for being used (as it's tagged as non-free). Currently, it's not being used in any article, partially due to these problems.

If you don't plan to use this image anymore, just ignore this message, and some admin will eventually take care of it. Best regards, --Abu Badali 17:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Numbers
I haven't a clue. They started turning up about a month ago but I can't seem to find any information about them. I must assume they're some sort of statistical thing. 23skidoo 19:56, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Heads up
That anon with the bee in his bonnet regarding radio show links seems to be on the prowl again. I haven't seen him removing any links from any of "my" articles (i.e. Saint, Crime Club, etc) but you might want to keep an eye on Nero Wolfe, etc. 23skidoo 06:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The guy is really on a roll. His latest comments at User talk:76.170.239.56‎ about me rich. He claims I'm a sockpuppet of another user, and that I am continuing to post libellous comments about him. He's an outright liar that guy. I don't know why someone doesn't just ban him permanently. I'd do so myself, but can't due to conflict of interest. 23skidoo 06:15, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Campbell cites
Hayford, I just emailed you some info for the Campbell article; let me know if you don't get it--I've had some email troubles. Mike Christie (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Unsupported accusations, abuse of edit summaries
Please accept this as a polite request to stop making unsupported accusations on the Earhart talk page and stop the use of threats and other abusive remarks in your edit summaries. Thank you. Gwen Gale 04:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Trolls
Please review What is a troll. Trolling is a deliberate, bad faith attempt to disrupt the editing of Wikipedia ...Genuine dissent is not trolling. I'm only saying that the AE article header reads like a press release written by GP. Since none of you seem to know who GP is, for starters, I suggest you ask me over on the talk page. Thanks and no, I'm not playing games, I'm trying to understand how much y'all know about this topic. Gwen Gale 18:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the above comments
I was going to leave a general comment regarding the anon you reverted on my talk page, but the above two postings have gotten my attention. Please see my posting to the user here. I know I'm sticking my neck in, but from all evidence that I can see, the two accusations being made above are unfounded and without merit. 23skidoo 04:04, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Here is the diff wherein Hayford Peirce made the utterly unfounded, uninformed and careless accusation. So far as I know the issue has been resolved and there are no hard feelings on my part, I'm only providing this citation to show the basis of my response. Cheers to you both! :) Gwen Gale 17:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Mayonnaise
I wasn't the one who removed the paragraph in the first place; the new version just felt more right to me. Purely a matter of taste, I suppose. Thank you for your rewrite, in any case. 18:26, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism on my userpage
Thanks again for handling that bit of vandalism. The only reason it happened was because another admin unprotected the page without consulting with me first. It's protected again so that should be the end of that for awhile. 23skidoo 02:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * When I went to re-protect the page, I noticed that one must now specify a duration for the protection. That might have been why he unprotected it. But it still would have been nice to explain the reasoning to me. And the evidence shows that that page needs protection for a good reason. Part of the problem is I'm the first listed administrator because my handle is the only one that starts with a number. (I keep hoping a new admin comes along with a handle starting with the number 1). So people with no lives who like to cause trouble take a look at the admin list, see me, and I'm an easy target. Incidentally the reason I put that "don't add me to categories" thing was because I noticed a number of categories being created to try and pigeonhole administrators, so I wanted to stop that. If one of the userboxes puts me in a category, that's fine, but at least I chose the userbox. On another topic, I'm not getting involved in the Earhart situation unless it's requested. I reacted to the messages left here as I felt they were somewhat out-of-line based upon having no reference to what she was complaining abou and no indication at the Earhart pages. I don't think your comments (as cited) warranted the reaction, but the user in question has indicated she wants to drop the matter, so unless you want to pick it up, we can leave it there. 23skidoo 05:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned images?
I happened to notice that you removed two orphaned image notices from this page, with the comment "removed strange bot additions." This suggests you may not have understood the purpose of the notices. They were just meant to inform that two images you uploaded are in fact not used in any articles. The idea is that you should either delete them / request they be deleted, or go ahead and use them somewhere. -- IslandGyrl 18:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Riggs-Court
Hey there. Actually, the information about this match is in the "Career timeline" section of her article. But I understand your basic point and agree that it is sufficiently notable to be discussed in the "Biography" section instead. Cheers. Tennis expert 05:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alias the Saint1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alias the Saint1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 08:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I just noticed the above and went to check. It looks like you had uploaded a second version of this cover at one point. I can go ahead and delete it if you'd like or you can just let the system handle it. 23skidoo 14:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Catboner vandal
I've blocked the IP for 24 hours, but since it is an IP, I can't do more than that, I'm afraid. Indefinite blocks are only allowed for IPs in extreme cases when it can be confirmed that no other users are likely to be affected. This is probably a school machine. Someone has already protected the Phillips page, I see. 23skidoo 14:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jack Crawford Time Cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jack Crawford Time Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 22:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Dorothy Parker
Rather than cut out someone's addition, why don't you flag it and bring it to the discussion page? The item on Carla Bruni is kind of a big deal. The songs were mentioned on CNN and other places this week. I added a references link to that section. Thanks. --K72ndst 04:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Alexander Woollcott
If you read the discussion page for Alexander Woollcott: it is Shubert, not Schubert, as every Broadway theatergoer knows. --K72ndst 21:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Rosewall article
Thanks very much. Like you, I have thought for a long time that the article needs to be reworked. But the magnitude of the task seemed too severe. I finally decided to start working on the article section-by-section and tackled probably the easiest section to edit, Rosewall's amateur career. But I'm not happy with the way that section flows and would welcome your enhancements. One major aspect I don't like is the lack of a narrative description of his amateur career. Statistics and match results are fine, but there needs to be interesting context. Best regards! Tennis expert 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Cheesesteak
Hello and thanks for your input on the Cheesesteak article. Please see my response to your edit on the associated talk page. Cheers! --Thisisbossi 05:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Who is Babe Ruth? Sounds like a playmate from the 50ies.
Talk pages are there for exchange between editors, "edit" "summaries" are just that. Anyway, if I correctly interpreted what you wrote in your edit summary here, you asked me if I'd insist on references for a similar assertion on Babe Ruth. Answer: Yes, of course. An extraordinarily strong assertion like " generally considered to be one of the greatest of all time" needs extraordinarily good references, otherwise it would be non-verifiable, non-neutral and possibly original research and should definitely be deleted in order to improve the article. Well, I gave you a chance instead of deleting this at once, and you provided two sources, and thank you for that. In my private life, I'm a fan of Pete Sampras and the stellar tennis he played - but this is not my soapbox, it's an online encyclopedia project, and I am trying to honour all the work others have done and are doing by taking it serious. Just like you. End of discussion, case closed. —Kncyu38 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Page protection
Just a friendly heads-up - the template doesn't actually protect a page - it just adds the message. Only an administrator can protect a page, but anyone can request protection at WP:RPP. Anyway, I think the problem on Mammary intercourse is only with one individual - his IP was blocked, and the image that has been added repeatedly is listed for a deletion discussion, and in the meantime can only be added to an the article by an administrator. RJASE1 Talk  13:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Turkeyman
Someone beat me to it; it was already gone before I got there. Cheers! 23skidoo 19:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Main Templar article
We may need to keep an eye on the main Simon Templar article as someone who is obviously a big Val Kilmer fan tried to place an image of Kilmer as the lead picture for the article, and the infobox was obviously based upon the film rather than the books (anyone who reads Charteris knows Templar prefers his knives over a pistol). I've tried to fix things up and have asked the user to explain his rationale in the talk page, so we'll see what happens. The image he'd placed has already been flagged for deletion anyway as it wasn't tagged properly. Incidentally, for those keeping score, I just finished Prelude for War (not one of the better Saint books but Charteris makes some very accurate predictions about WW2). I'm taking a break from the Saint for a bit while I read some Doctor Who and a couple of non-fiction books, and then it's on to Follow the Saint. 23skidoo 04:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I agree it isn't vandalism though it looks like the editor is about to get a little slap on the wrist for uploading images with no licensing info. I haven't read any Hamilton in a long time, mainly because of my Saint reading project, and more recently I've gotten back into reading Doctor Who books again because of the brilliant series revival on TV. I found a goody a few days ago, though, a paperback of essays by Hamilton called On Guns and Hunting. Looks interesting. 23skidoo 04:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Sources discussion
Did you intend to leave that message with Mattisse on my talk page? Just checking in case you'd accidentally left it there. I agree that the new standards are going render stubs out of many articles. This might be the straw that breaks this camel's back and makes me abandon Wikipedia for good. I have an article on Bill Haley that I fear is about to be destroyed (and I don't care if WP:OWN says no one owns the articles; I still put in a lot of time and effort for FREE on that thing). 23skidoo 16:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Pancho Segura.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pancho Segura.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 20:51, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Tilden Hitting an Overhead.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tilden Hitting an Overhead.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC) {subst:image source|Image:Hoad Backhand Volley.jpg}} Abu badali (talk) 20:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gonzales Against Roche 1968.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gonzales Against Roche 1968.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gonzales Hitting Backhand Volley.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gonzales Hitting Backhand Volley.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Gonzales Serving.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Gonzales Serving.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 21:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jack Kramer Volleying.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jack Kramer Volleying.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Tilden at the Baseline.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tilden at the Baseline.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Rosewall Volleying Wimbledon 1970.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rosewall Volleying Wimbledon 1970.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:18, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Vinnie Richards2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vinnie Richards2.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:36, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Your auto-biography on Wikipedia
Hi, Mr. Peirce. I noticed that, other than for minnor cosmetic changes (like adding or removing categories or reverting vandalism), you're the only contributor to the article you created about yourself. In the case you haven't yet, you may be interested in reading Conflict of interest and Autobiography, Wikipedia policies dealing with, among other things, editors writing about themselves.

I also noticed that some of the information you added in your article in unsourced, just as well as an (imho) overall feeling of lack of notability (please, don't be offended. Someone not being notable doesn't means his not important).

I will edit you autobiography to ask for some sources where I feel they are necessary (please, don't think this means I don't believe those passages to be true).

Also, I ask you to try not to feel offended if your Wikipedia autobiography is nominated for deletion (depending on the outcome of the source-asking).

You may want to read Articles for deletion/David McJonathan-Swarm for a (maybe) similar case.

Best regards, --Abu badali (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rod Laver 2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rod Laver 2.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Tilden in the 1920s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tilden in the 1920s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Bill Johnston.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bill Johnston.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Budge against Perry.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Budge against Perry.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 03:18, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Young Gonzales.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Young Gonzales.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bill Johnston and Bill Tilden.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bill Johnston and Bill Tilden.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:1925 Davis Cup Team.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:1925 Davis Cup Team.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Tilden and Dempsey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tilden and Dempsey.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

{subst:image source|Image:Tilden and Kozeluh.jpg}} Abu badali (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bill Tilden Hitting a Backhand.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bill Tilden Hitting a Backhand.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Pasarell Cropped.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pasarell Cropped.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vinnie Richards Cover2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vinnie Richards Cover2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Karel Kozeluh Photo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Karel Kozeluh Photo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Rosewall and Sedgman 1954.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rosewall and Sedgman 1954.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Sedgman Volleying.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sedgman Volleying.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Sedgman Volleying 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sedgman Volleying 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Kramer and Sedgman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kramer and Sedgman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Pancho Segura.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pancho Segura.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Segura Roland Garros 1946.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Segura Roland Garros 1946.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Kramer and Sedgman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kramer and Sedgman.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Vines 1933.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Vines 1933.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Jack Crawford and Harry Hopman 1930s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jack Crawford and Harry Hopman 1930s.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Borotra.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Borotra.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Borotra and Cochet.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Borotra and Cochet.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Cochet 1924.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cochet 1924.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)