User talk:Haykmovsesyan

Repatriation tax holiday
I'm afraid that your proposed revision of Repatriation tax holiday requires substantial revision before it can be included in the article, as it contains POV statements, unusable sources, and numerous basic grammatical errors such as run-on sentences, missing punctuation and missing definite articles and prepositions. For example, "on which the money could be spent upon" is grammatically incorrect, since "upon" is redundant to "on which", and "until the expiration of the tax holiday end of 2005" requires prepostional phrase like "at the end of 2005". Also phrases like "proponent of the reinvigoration of the economy through advantageous conditions for companies which would redirect their operation to USA" are excessively winding and presume the truth of the point in question, rather than properly framing it as a claim. Statements like "Donald Trump is working hard on bringing back cash" are purely POV, as well as unsourced. bd2412 T 13:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)