User talk:Hazel2114

Speedy deletion nomination of Rian Antonelli


A tag has been placed on Rian Antonelli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 22:37, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Rian Antonelli. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. red dogsix (talk) 22:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Rian Antonelli, you may be blocked from editing. red dogsix (talk) 00:14, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Rian Antonelli. red dogsix (talk) 00:41, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rian Antonelli, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 00:47, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rian Antonelli


A tag has been placed on Rian Antonelli, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. red <b style="color:#000;">dog</b><i style="color:#000;">six</i> (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Regarding Speedy Deletion


 * Hello, Hazel2114. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
 * I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting <BIG>one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion. </BIG>
 * Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into <BIG>things to avoid</BIG> or <BIG>what Wikipedia is not.</BIG>


 * Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet <BIG>notability guidelines</BIG> with <BIG>reliable sources</BIG> providing<BIG> verifiable information.</BIG> That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. 
 * Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere . Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
 * Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
 * Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
 * Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
 * For test edits, click Hazel2114/sandbox
 * If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
 * You may find this tool useful: Google custom search


 * If you reply to me on your talk page, please place at the beginning of your reply.

If you have verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject does meet notability requirements Let me know. CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED. Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)