User talk:Hazelmcsoupy

Welcome

 * }

Hi Hazelmcsoupy, thanks for your contribution to the Open access article. However, please take a bit of time to have a look at Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, neutrality and original research. If there is a notable source making this argument, it may very well be included, but the article is not a good venue to describe personal observations and conclusions. Also, it seems to me that the claim "Some open access content is rather unstable and ephemeral compared to the content managed by traditional for-profit publishers" may be confusing the difference between open and closed access with that between online and printed journals. (For example, in the case of the bankruptcy of a commercial publisher, their paywalled online journals might very well become unavailable for an extended period of time, whereas their open access journals could be mirrored by other entities.) Regards, HaeB (talk) 01:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)