User talk:Hazemshoukry

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazem Shoukry Designs


A tag has been placed on Hazem Shoukry Designs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:57, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Articles
If you don't show notability (see WP:CORP and back your claims up with reliable independent sources WP:RS, the article will be deleted. It's no good just posting part of an article and hoping we'll approve that part. It doesn't work like that. If you don't show notability from the start (and avoid the pitfalls of Indian English being more flowery than the English of the UK and the USA, and possibly being regarded as promotional for that), you have no chance. Find the sources before you try again. No blogs, forums, Facebook, Youtube, press releases. directories, and nothing self published like LinkedIn or your own site. Remember that this is an encyclopaedia, and not every company gets in. Peridon (talk) 18:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hazem Shoukry Designs


A tag has been placed on Hazem Shoukry Designs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Reply to email
I did tell you above about getting reliable independent sources WP:RS. Also, having a mission is not really encyclopaedic writing - see WP:NPOV - and some of the rest of the article is a bit like that too. But it's the references that's the main problem. You cannot show notability from the company site, flickr and two directories. Your work looks great. Your company possibly is notable - remember, we are talking Wikipedia notability which means being reported on in independent reliable sources. Find the sources, and do what it says in the blue box when you've chosen a new name that is not connected to the company. Then get back in touch.. You can still edit this page - I'll keep an eye on it for your comments. Peridon (talk) 22:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * So long as you read, understand and follow WP:NPOV, there's a good chance if you have the references too. Give a list of them here - saves setting everything up if they aren't good enough. If you come up with good ones, I'll help with getting the wording improved. Peridon (talk) 18:49, 15 November 2011 (UTC)