User talk:Hazlnut

November 2015
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Erik Bergquist with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 02:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Erik Bergquist, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Your message to me a few minutes ago seems to refer to my message of six days ago. I checked the article in view of your message and current blanking of the page and found that only one of the sources exists. I suggest you not blank the entire page if your edit is questioned again, since a bare minimum of information is apparently true. Page blanking is a red flag for reviewers. I will not revert your current edit or edits in view of the lack of verifiable sources due to dead links and your concern but I can only speak for myself. (I am not an administrator.)


 * If you are unable to get the article changed through the editing process, which sometimes happens, please see Biographies of living persons/Help. Also relevant may be Biographies of living persons, Deletion policy and Articles for Deletion. Donner60 (talk) 04:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)