User talk:Hb1290

March 2020
Hello, I'm Jai49. I noticed that you recently removed content from Henry Cavill without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jai49 (talk) 11:49, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * That was an honest mistake on my part. I meant to undo the previous edit, the guy I reverted beat me to it and I reverted his by mistake. Had I realised, I would have self-reverted right away Hb1290 (talk) 13:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Josh Mandel
Hi, please be careful about WP:3RR and WP:BLP. Thanks for the report, but this isn't monochrome – it's pretty grayscale. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Dynadot
You are in error about my edit. I am a client of Dynadot. The piece I removed has NOTHING WHATSOVER to do with Dynadot. It doesn't belong there. Please remove it! "Hello, I'm Hb1290. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Dynadot. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake," — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.97.31.22 (talk) 23:55, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
 * While I agree that the weight given to that lawsuit is probably WP:UNDUE, blanking it entirely was unneccesary. Also, based on what you have just stated in this message, you have a WP:COI and should not be editing that page yourself. Instead request edits on the article's talk page. Hb1290 (talk) 03:56, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Proof
I don't mean to get into an edit war, I simply want proof to a so-called source, am I asking too much? 108.208.137.67 (talk) 04:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I totally get it, but you just weren't going about it the right way. I see now you've posted on the article's talk page. That's what you should have done in the first place when you got reverted. Hb1290 (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

United States Capitol subway system
i noticed that you dropped a copyvio template on the page saying it was copied from a US government website. however, US government works are generally Public domain as per. it's rather unlikely that the Architect of the Capitol's website is copyright. see also WP:PD -- Aunva6talk - contribs 05:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

block notices may be removed
Hi, while your reversal is fine, WP:UP only refers to declined unblock requests, not block notifications – which have served their purpose when they've been read ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Understood. Thanks for the heads up. Hb1290 (talk) 09:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)