User talk:Hberry2

Meghli
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Meghli, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://lebaneserecipes.org/meghli. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Meghli
A tag has been placed on Meghli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shashwat986 (talk) 04:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Meghli
Hi, Hberry2. I have again reverted your edits on the Meghli article page. Note that anise is specifically mentioned in the references -- therefore it should remain. Also note that Wikipedia is not a how-to guide and therefore recipes are not included. Please see the talk page. The article can use expansion of history and modern use sections, like other food-related articles -- but only using properly cited reliable sources. If you have further questions, please feel free to ask. — Cactus Writer |   needles  06:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Meghli.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Meghli.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 21:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Meghli, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Cactus Writer |   needles  17:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)