User talk:Hc1989

In response to your message, I have to point out some holes in your process. If it were indeed true that I was insulting my friend, even though you know that I am not because you actually read it (yeah right). Is this the response to your pitiful website; to delete and gang up on new members who create new articles??

I, and many others who read this article (before it was wrongly censored) believe that the admin staff for this website are simply trying to exercise totalitarian control over the site, the only place where others actually have to take note of their opinions.

Lastly, it does not legitimise it if I did it whilst bored in a study period. However, as this formed part of a lesson (a marketing exercise: I can’t place products on the site, so I used a person)

And, responding to the last point of your message, I will feel free to insult the incompetent whenever I choose. Constructive criticism seems to have little effect on the isolated minds of the administrators.

A last thought: don't these sort of things, that are causing no apparent or significant harm be given a weeks (or even a few days) grace before deletion. The users of the site will show you what they appreciate. (Even if this is too much of a democratic process for ADMIN jong-il)


 * Yes it does do harm, letting wikipedia fill with non-encyclopedic content damages the encyclopedia. Please see what wikipedia is not, it's not for any old crap you want to post here (we are an encylopedia, if all the users show us what they appreciate by voting to turn in it into something else then sorry the users won't get their way, no), it's not an experiment in democracy. Given your attitude above I assure you that if you aren't willing to meet the basic standards of civility you won't be welcome here. --pgk 18:21, 20 October 2006 (UTC)