User talk:Hcaoduc

Microsoft Visual C#
You have made a series of edits to the article Microsoft Visual C# and I want to point a few things out that may improve your writing.


 * You removed the summary text at the top of the article: It is customary to have a summary of all the article's contents at the top. If the article is a stub and doesn't contain any subsections then the summary is the only content.
 * You added an introduction section: Articles typically don't include such a section. The summary at the top usually contains introductory information.
 * You used five non-breaking spaces for indentation: Articles do not make use of such indentation.
 * You wrote the article like a tutorial: Encyclopedic articles are not tutorials. For example, you should never address the reader. The project Wikibooks is for tutorials.
 * You wrote about topics unrelated to the article: The article is titled Microsoft Visual C Sharp and should therefore only be about Microsoft Visual C Sharp. You shouldn't write about the IDE in this article but in the Visual Studio article. The information in the Windows application programing section doesn't belong in this article. It relates to the application programming interfaces and class libraries and not to the programming language itself.

Stefán Örvar Sigmundsson (talk) 20:10, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VCSStartPageForWikipediaArticle.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:VCSStartPageForWikipediaArticle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:LIBNhom41235.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:LIBNhom41235.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:LIBNhom41234.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LIBNhom41234.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:01, 18 December 2014 (UTC)