User talk:Hcikim/Sylvia Speller

Thank you for your contributions! Overall, the wiki page looks great. I would just suggest to maybe provide more information (if there is any) about Dr. Speller's scientific contributions in little more details, or elaborate more on her research interests, or awards she has received. As for the selected articles/research papers you shared, it would help the reader to know why these two articles were included/or selected. You probably have a rationale for why you picked these two articles, but if not it might be helpful for the reader if you include Dr. Speller's most cited papers -- you can usually find this through Google Scholar if there is a profile for Dr. Speller. Mo791 (talk) 21:45, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Peer Review
The lead provides a good overview of chronological accomplishments, and outlines the areas of focus that are covered in the main article. The content is neutral and linked to reliable sources, but it seems rather sparse. It would help to give a bit more description of what the teaching and research areas entail. Especially for her research, the article should outline what her main contributions where in these areas, and why they are significant. Ideally this should then sync up with the selected publications, which would be the papers that contained these contributions. Three of the references all link to the same page, so there are only two unique references. Both of these are from the university faculty pages, so I'm not sure that they support the notability requirements on their own. It would be helpful if the content provided more information about the significance of Speller's work and the overall impact of her career. KO525W (talk) 15:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)