User talk:Hcmontessori200

Welcome!
Hello, Hcmontessori200, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 16:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Note that we'd need independent reliable sources for your edits
Doug Weller talk 16:54, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 17:08, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, I'm Politanvm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pearl Bailey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Politanvm talk 13:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:50, 18 February 2023 (UTC)


 * All edits were made from a neutral place and happen to state all sides of the facts of the edited page's content. The parts edited were not commentary. I found that the page was very biased toward a left-leaning viewpoint and did not accurately portray the sentiments being shared by the right. Please state which parts of the edit you found that were to be from a biased point of view, what you claim to be commentary? Also, please site from where you base your sense of neutrality. Thank you. Hcmontessori200 (talk) 06:15, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries, even if unintentional, you may be blocked from editing.

This edit, which substantively changed the POV of the article in contravention of strongly established consensus, was most certainly not a "fixed typo" as you claimed in your edit summary. Deception of this kind is extremely disruptive to a collaborative project like Wikipedia. Generalrelative (talk) 22:14, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for POV editing and vandalism, adding unsourced, a number of warnings, see latest edit. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 18:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

in other words, you csn still use talk pages. But note that we enforce policies and guidelines on talk pages also and more strictly in the topic area of post-1992 American politics.

Reminder about the topic area of post 1992 American politics
You have recently made edits related to abortion. This is a standard message to inform you that abortion is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. For a summary of difference between the former and new system, see WP:CTVSDS. Doug Weller talk 18:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)