User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2018/January

proton
I tried to talk about it in talk:Proton. Nobody has been interested in the discussion for a month. The current image is wrong because the strong force between quarks is not a two-particle relationship, and this particular Y-shape configuration was derived in this paper:. Ok, if you wish, I can wait another week, and then change it again. Olaf (talk) 00:16, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your BRFA
Your BRFA, Bots/Requests for approval/JCW-CleanerBot 3, has been approved for trial. — xaosflux  Talk 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Your BRFA, Bots/Requests for approval/JCW-CleanerBot 3, has been approved. Happy editing. —  xaosflux  Talk 04:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bouncing ball
The article Bouncing ball you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Bouncing ball for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reyk -- Reyk (talk) 11:41, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Nova Science Publishers
You reverted my edit on Nova Science Publishers. I'd just like to hear your reasoning. Thanks. Potatornado (talk) 18:53, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * You've removed sourced material without discussion or consensus. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)