User talk:Headbomb/Archives/2023/February

Avoid reverting during discussion
Hey, I notice that you deleted content from Science that was under discussion at. I have the status quo version. Could you try to follow the BRD cycle and discuss before making changes that have already been contested? &mdash;&hairsp; Freoh 18:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Replied there. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Boole's Rule
I have explained at Talk:Boole's rule why I believe this source is acceptable under Reliable sources. Please explain your opposition there before reverting the article again. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 16:55, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I have raised the issue, and mentioned your opposition, at Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Please respond there to help generate a consensus instead of potentially edit-warring on the article itself. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 17:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Replied there. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 19:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Avi (talk) 23:26, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:List of mesons
Template:List of mesons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Help?
Hope all is well with you. I try so hard not to bother you with my technical issues, but I cannot figure this one out. I am positive it is some kind of coding problem with a foreign language, (seems to be triggered by ù) but we all know technology is above my pay grade. I looked at URL encoding, but literally, it just makes my head swim and I cannot comprehend what language it is speaking. o.0 On this article I just started it doesn't like the url. I copied it from the article link and then tried from the wayback link. Neither gets rid of the error code. Can you help? I truly appreciate your expertise. SusunW (talk) 17:04, 8 February 2023 (UTC)


 * What error are you seeing? I don't see any. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:26, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Seem Jonesey95 got to it first. The issue was that you had url instead of live &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 17:27, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I wish it was simpler, but I appreciate you both coming to my rescue. SusunW (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Citing sources
Hey, I notice that you recently a category to Plum pudding model that had previously been challenged. Don't forget that the verifiability policy applies to categories as well. &mdash;&hairsp; Freoh 02:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I'm struggling real hard to see WP:AGF behaviour here. That the plum pudding model model is obsolete is patently obvious and has been so since Rutherford discovered the nucleus in 1911 or so. (And this is cited before you try to get me on a 'technicality'.) &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
You are receiving this message because you were a Good article reviewer on at least one article that is part of Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 or you signed up for messages. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of Good articles for copyright and other problems, unless a reviewer opens an independent Good article reassessment and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information. A list of the GA reviewers can be found here. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. You can opt in or out of further messages at this page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Jupiter Trojan or Jupiter trojan?
Can you please take a look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Jupiter_trojan#Jupiter_Trojan_or_Jupiter_trojan and give your opinion?

Thanks, JS (talk) 02:34, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Cleaning up english in ADA article . ..
With your permission, I would like to take the rough edges off the English in your article on ADA. For credibility, I worked at the Aladdin ring in Madison Wi USA for several years, and visited Frascati once and looked at the operating ADONE through the thick lead-glass windows. I won't change the substance of the article. Dr.gregory.retzlaff (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)


 * You don't need my permission to do that, that's why we have WP:BOLD. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'm relatively new here and did not want to step on anyone's toes or get a bad reputation. I'll get to it tomorrow, will be nothing major and take a lot of time. Dr.gregory.retzlaff (talk) 07:01, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:EuCML cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EuCML cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Failure to "get the point"
Hey, I notice that you are to describe Peter Carruthers, Marlize Lombard, Michael Shermer, and Sven Ove Hansson as amateurs, even after I've explained repeatedly at the noticeboard discussion that they are reputable experts, and other editors there agreed that this peer-reviewed academic source is reliable. I find it disruptive that you are still acting like you didn't hear that and that you are continuing to edit war on the Science article. &mdash;&hairsp; Freoh 00:11, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * No one agreed with you that your source was reliable. And if you've got nothing productive to say, go away. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 00:30, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * said that this source could support an attributed opinion claim. According to Wikipedia's reliable source policy, we publish only the analysis, views, and opinions of reliable authors, so I interpreted their comment as affirming the reliability of this article.     &mdash;&hairsp; Freoh 11:22, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * The full quote would be At most, this kind of writing could support an attributed opinion claim. It's not enough to justify our saying, in Wiki-voice, that those practices are the "roots of science" and that they do in fact have the pedigree suggested. That is not "affirming the reliability of the article." &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 11:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * is right. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 12:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing that predatory journal, when I was first adding it it did seem rather suspicious that barely any other articles on Wikipedia used it, but now I know X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 04:14, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:WikiProject Wikipedia-Books
Hello, Headbomb,

This category was tagged for speedy deletion, CSD C1, as an empty category and I just wanted to make sure you received notice in case this category was emptied out of process. If everything is okay with this, well, then just consider yourself notified. Hope you have a good week! Liz Read! Talk! 22:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Cheers &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)