User talk:Healing toolbox

Welcome
 Hello Healing toolbox, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
 * Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Healing toolbox, good luck, and have fun. --Aboutmovies (talk) 16:51, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

To Be Or Not To Be (film)
I've reverted your addition to this article because it violates several Wikipedia policies. Please read our policy on neutral point of view and the one on original research. The executive summary is this: please do not add your own personal opinions to articles. Any opinion, interpretation or analysis must be accompanied by a citation from a legitimate reliable source that is qualified to express the opinion. If people consider this film "the other Casablanca", then surely someone with credentials must have written about it somewhere. Find that source, and you can use it to support adding the opinion to the article. Without such a source, though, the opinion cannot appear in the article. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Rudolf Steiner
Thanks for working on this article. The section on Goethe's ideas about animal biology is valuable.

I think the passage about Lehrs and the Waldorf schools would better go into other articles -- for example, one about Goethean science generally, or about Waldorf education. I hope this is all right with you!hgilbert (talk) 23:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Habit body for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Habit body is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Habit body until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Automatic Strikeout  19:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Inner Family or Inner Court model of the human being


The article Inner Family or Inner Court model of the human being has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability. Close to original research

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Blog? !
Please note: Wikipedia is not for blogs and does not accept original research. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Spiritual Geography PACME


A tag has been placed on Spiritual Geography PACME, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Peridon (talk) 09:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion
If you're contesting AfD, you have to go to the link on the AfD box at the top of the page. Peridon (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

The page Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PACME spiritual geography has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the content of the page appeared to be exist purely to promote your beliefs, and which was unlikely to be suitable for an article (or at best would need a fundamental rewrite). Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion of anything, whether a company, product, group, service, person, religious or political belief, or anything else. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam. There are plenty of web sites which are suitable for trying to pubkicise your beliefs, but Wikipedia is not one of them. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:45, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The same applies to other pages you have created, such as Inner Family or Inner Court model of the human being. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:48, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 17:36, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Four temperaments, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:03, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Representational systems (NLP). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MartinPoulter (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=579315185 your edit] to Etheric plane may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * For TALK on this page: This page is a start on the topic, covering headlines of history.  What's
 * After moving from the single etheric plan concept expressed clearly on this page, to a two-fold

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Etheric plane. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ''You can click on the talk tab near the top of the article to start a discussion about the article. Let me know if you need help.'' - MrX 22:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

September 2018
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Bruno Gröning for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.

November 2020
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Pantothenic acid. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. ''Read the ODS and LPI reviews, and diversity of food sources containing the vitamin. "Deficiency" is 'very rare' in the 21st century.'' Zefr (talk) 17:56, 27 November 2020 (UTC)