User talk:HealthNut42

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacred Herbology (May 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Iwaqarhashmi were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacred Herbology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Sacred_Herbology Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iwaqarhashmi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sacred_Herbology reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 Waqar 💬 14:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sacred Herbology has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sacred Herbology. Thanks! -- NotC hariza rd 🗨 14:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Notcharizard Thank you for your feedback. I will rewrite the information with the formatting you are requesting.
 * Could you please expand on your comment regarding reliable sources? I have chosen an extensive list of highly credible books and studies etc to cite from. This would have been accepted in a masters degree but not wiki.
 * I am new to this, but educated enough to figure it out with the assistance of more experienced wiki editors.
 * I genuinely want to contribute this topic l, so any advice on how to proceed will be greatly appreciated.
 * TIA!
 * HealthNut42 HealthNut42 (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello! I did not have a problem with your sources at all (athough I did not check if they match what you wrote), the rejection and comment on sources/tone was made by @Iwaqarhashmi. My comment was all to do with formatting, links and headings mostly. I do agree that some of the tone was unencyclopedic - things like "a worldview that encompasses a rich tapestry of symbolism." and the entirity of the symbolism section sounds like original research and your own analysis. It's beautiful written, but not right for Wikipedia. -- NotC hariza rd  🗨 03:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Hmm, thanks for your feedback!
 * I will keep working on it as I get time.
 * I appreciate you taking the time to reply. HealthNut42 (talk) 11:18, 28 May 2024 (UTC)