User talk:HeartBD2K

NDUFB3
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of NDUFB3, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://monarchinitiative.org/gene/NCBIGene:4709.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:00, 12 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you . The text in question is in the public domain. I have added the appropriate NLM content tag and reference.   HeartBD2K    talk   20:53, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Citation tool
Thanks for your great contributions to Gene Wiki articles! If you haven't seen this yet, please check out User:Diberri's Wikipedia template filling tool (instructions). Given a PubMed ID, one can quickly produce a full citation that can be copied and pasted into a Wikipedia article. This tool can save you a lot of work and ensure that the citations are displayed in a consistent manner. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 11:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Animal studies
Concerning the animal studies section of ACADL‎, almost all the sources in this paragraph are to animal studies. Furthermore the results of animal studies quite often do not translate into human. Hence it is highly misleading to title this section clinical significance. Per WP:MEDANIMAL, I have therefore changed back the title to animal studies to avoid any implication that the results are applicable to humans. Boghog (talk) 05:08, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, HeartBD2K, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Big Data to Knowledge. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!  Blue Rasberry  (talk)  17:32, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Gene Wiki article names
Hi. Concerning the Gene Wiki, these articles are both the protein and the gene that encodes that protein. Per the MCB Style Guide, if the protein name is relatively short as is the case with Desmin, the protein name should be used in preference to the gene name. Also per MOS:BOLD, only the first occurrence of the gene symbol or protein name are bolded in an article. If a section is a target of the redirect, then these more specialized terms should also be bolded, but only at their first occurrence. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello . Thank you very much for your input. I agree that, in the case of Desmin, the protein name should be used rather than the gene name. I am also working on a set of sarcomeric and contractile proteins that have several different names which are used much more commonly than the gene name. I might request your input on renaming these articles. As for bolded gene names, thank you for informing me of this convention in MOS:BOLD. I am becoming more familiar with Wikipedia conventions on style and content and I will be sure to follow this in my future edits. Again, thank you for all of the help you have provided in the past couple of weeks, I really appreciate it.   HeartBD2K    talk   20:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.  kashmiri TALK  19:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)