User talk:HeartGlow30797/Archives/2020/November

db
Please do not do edits like this. User talk pages are not eligible for deletion and you shouldn't be requesting them on behalf of other users. --Yamla (talk) 14:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Got it, my mistake. Thanks for notifying me!  Mr. Heart  (talk) 14:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Cavetown (musician)&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 02:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism Unit
Hi HeartGlow30797. I saw that you were open to take new students in the Counter-Vandalism Unit. Could you please train me? Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Excutient (talk • contribs) 08:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is, the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by. In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were, , and. The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.


 * wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
 * win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
 * wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
 * wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
 * wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.
 * wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Occupational burnout&#32; on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 22:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

That's not just any incoherent string!
That's not just any incoherent string, that's Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch! 2600:8805:2300:31D:1D7B:2E80:7CAC:EA3A (talk) 00:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Please only use the sandbox for potential articles looking to be published.  Heart  (talk) 02:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Intelcom Express update page
Hello, I am so unfamiliar with Wikipedia, I hope this is the correct space to contact you. I saw your reply to my comment on our company's page where I listed new articles about the company. 1. New opening in Chicoutimi (French interview with the CFO) https://www.lequotidien.com/actualites/un-centre-de-distribution-ouvert-pour-amazon-a-chicoutimi-a9d4d0e63af2d8da74e3c5ed1d17edd0 2. AI helping Intelcom to deliver more packages on time (French interview with the president) https://www.957kyk.com/audio/319183/le-president-dintelcom-nous-raconte-comment-lintelligence-artificielle-laide-a-livrer-vos-colis

We were also asking if our side info block could be updated: 1. The company now has over 900 employees and 50 different locations. 2. The two Subsidiaries are no longer in operation.

And finally for the French version of the page https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelcom_Express to reflect the new logo of the company and the updated version as shown of the English page.

Thank you so much for your help!

Valerie
 * Evaluating requested additions...  Heart  (talk) 02:48, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Re: Fletcher House (Otago Peninsula)
Wow - a bit quick off the mark... I start a stub, say in my edit summary that I'm still working on it, and withing a coupe of minutes you template it for not having enough sources! I'm not that fast at adding in the extra material! Can you slow down a bit in future? Grutness... wha?   03:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , my apologies. I can slow down a bit into the future. Thanks for letting me know about your inconvenience.  Heart  (talk) 03:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No prob :) Grutness... wha?   03:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

CVU Academy
Hello, I was wondering if you could train me for the CVU. Jackalope 10 03:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)Jackalope 10

I want to ask a questions
Hello. My question is How to check the full detail of all my edits till now and when i make my account and other? Can you please tell me? \ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.8.179.131 (talk) 06:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry what is the question?  Heart  (talk) 04:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

figuring out my help desk question
Hi, Thank you so much for answering my help desk question. I tried to add the to it, but unfortunately it merged with the other post. Sorry about that! If you can help me fix that an archive it, I would greatly appreciate it...still working at this!
 * I fixed it for you! Just be sure to put templates on a different line than the header! Enjoy your day!  Heart  (talk) 03:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your signature
Your custom signature is shrinking every listing @WP:RM for every relisting you've done so far. Jerm (talk) 05:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , noted, I will just sign with my username and the time, thank you for letting me know.  Heart  (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

BLPProd
Hi. I notice that you tagged (and then self-reverted out of AGF) Segun Okubadejo for BLPPRod. However, this page has three sources and is thus not eligible for BLPProd. These bishops have dubious notability, but that would require an AfD to determine. BLPProd is very narrow, and is only to be used for BLPs with no sources at all.

Looking at other speedy deletion taggings you recently made, Draft:Kicgle is not a G11, it is just a draft with a total lack of notability so far. G11 needs ative, overwhelming, promotional content, not just bare facts. You should also give people a bit more time before e.g. tagging a draft as G1 (it will probably be correct in the end, but normally one should wait at least 10 minutes in mainspace, and preferably longer in draft space). Fram (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , Hello, in regard to the article of Segun Okubadejo, all three sources are profiles from different churches. And looking at Draft:Kicgle, I did a quick google search and found that it was basically nonexistent with no sources. I will wait ten minutes in the future to ensure this though! Thanks for letting me know!  Heart  (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * And I see Draft:Kicgle is now submitted for review...  Heart  (talk) 15:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello
Hello HeartGlow30797, thank you once is enough, fourteen within 20 minutes is annoying. Regards --Serols (talk) 16:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I'm sorry, every time I hit "g" to mark it as a nonmalicious edit, it thanks the editor...  Heart  (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Then please don't press g on me, thanks. Regards --Serols (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , I have started doing so. Thanks!  Heart  (talk) 17:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Clerking at RfArb
Hi, HeartGlow. I saw you did some clerking at RfArb. While edits like this are helpful most of the time, it is normally advised to leave clerking to the clerks and arbs because there are sometimes edge cases at play. If you think you would enjoy participating in the arbitration process, consider apply to the clerks office after a year of sustained editing. (If you are interested in moving from anti-vandalism and drama board work to content creation, please ping me!) -- Guerillero &#124;  Parlez Moi  05:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , will do! Thanks!  Heart  (talk) 05:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The First of Many???

 * Thank you so much! I love helping Wikipedians and helping to keep Wikipedia clean from any harm! Enjoy your day!  Heart  (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Querying two Teahouse reverts you made
I've probably missed something that would help me understand the background, but I don't quite understand why you've just twice removed this post from the Teahouse, rather than answering it. Could you explain? Thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , it has personal information of a phone-number, which I then followed up with an oversight request. Regards,  Heart  (talk) 16:40, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, I didn't see that. I'll revdel it now if you wish, but would you go to their talk page and explain why their post was removed, or they'll simply repeat the error? Thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 16:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * , thanks for bringing this to my attention. A revdel would be excellent! I'll let them know in the future! Thanks! Regards,  Heart  (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Done! You actually did just the right thing by deleting the post (and not publicly alerting everyone to the contact details they'd posted). Only once the content has either been redacted/revdeleted or fully oversighted is it then OK to publicly explain to the person why their post had been removed. I simply hadn't spotted the personal details myself. All's well that ends well! Nick Moyes (talk) 16:49, 28 November 2020 (UTC)