User talk:Heather.Richmond

Hey there
Hi, User:Heather.Richmond! I wish you luck with all the Wiki stuff!Sugarhearty (talk) 00:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi from Dr. V
Hi, Heather! We will have to work hard to find you a good article to edit. What can you find that interests you from a global perspective that is not psychology? Psychology has a strict standard for editing that is better to avoid! We can talk more in class. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 04:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Project Idea
I like the general idea of the laws and youth, it sounds interesting. But would you be able to get enough research for how that affects youth on a sociological way?

Sugarhearty (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Your proposal
Hi, HR-

I think you have a good idea to consider a new article. This will be an intensive task. Can you start right away to be thinking about an outline? What about using the structure of the Labor rights or Unfree labour but building it around the issue of child labor laws?

How will you connect this with the Child labour page?

I do not yet have a sense of sources you have found on the topic. I look forward to reading the bibliography. I think one good edited volume or encyclopedia article written on the topic would be a great help. Also, check out the International Labor Organization's website, and a new article by Jessica Taft. As you post sources, please write a bit about what each source says and how it contributes to your potential revisions. What do you have, and what are you still looking for? Ideally, you could also inform a reader how the sources you end up with will shape the revision plans you mention in your proposal.

It's time to get to work - this has great potential! Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 04:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Sources feedback
You have chosen sources that look like they have high potential to provide you with valuable information. The CATO institute source will help you present a NPOV. Do any of these sources have a historical component, which you say in your proposal you will discuss? Please fix the typos and formatting problems in your sources. Kayla can help you with this if you need it. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Child Labour Laws


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Child Labour Laws. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Child labour. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Child labour – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RichardOSmith (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Child labour laws


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Child labour laws. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Child labour. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Child labour – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. RichardOSmith (talk) 18:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)