User talk:HeaveTheClay/Messages I have received

Fair use rationale for Image:LinkCrossTrainingPressRelease.jpeg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:LinkCrossTrainingPressRelease.jpeg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sakurai.jpg
Considering this edit: Regards, High on a tree (talk) 20:32, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I explained my removal of this picture. It is not polite to roll my edit back without addressing these concerns.
 * Please familiarize yourself with Image_use_policy and Copyright violations before adding material of dubious copyright status again.

The list
ON Super smash bros. Don't touch the list you have no right to change what we all agreed on half the world already knows they are in next time you try to do that see the talk page for several reason like one you messed up the page by making Jiggly get out of place.--DarkFierceDeityLink 15:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * See the talk page before you do any changes to the table.--DarkFierceDeityLink 15:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008 == ==

The list

ON Super smash bros. Don't touch the list you have no right to change what we all agreed on half the world already knows they are in next time you try to do that see the talk page for several reason like one you messed up the page by making Jiggly get out of place.--DarkFierceDeityLink 15:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

See the talk page before you do any changes to the table.--DarkFierceDeityLink 15:09, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, the recent edit you made to Talk:Super Smash Bros. (series) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Snowolf How can I help? 16:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits.  Snowolf How can I help? 16:12, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes I did, but you can't remove comments from an article talk page.  Snowolf How can I help? 16:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you that what I have been trying to tell this user. This user has to say sorry to me for almost getting me blocked for undoing all the nonsense. Also its not speculation its all proven, that video is not from youtub but from Nintendo and the maker. which makes that a reliable thank you have a nice day and you really do have to say sorry to me.--DarkFierceDeityLink 20:26, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Don't touch my comments no one else complained about them but you what ever you have between stop it your about to get block i'm only telling you this so we could make a truce.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:51, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Listen
Lets work this out your not the 1st urser who i had a fight we and became friends with. Lets do this the right way by talking.--DarkFierceDeityLink 00:55, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I would bring them back but they were personal attacks your not allowed to say "Shut the hell up" "Crap" ect if I didn't take them off you would of been blocked also criticism is not allowed on wiki.--DarkFierceDeityLink 01:00, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * About the upset part i wasn't talking about you, your not the only one who didn't want to add them to the list your not the only one who said thats youtub not allwed.--DarkFierceDeityLink 01:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Simmer down, please
Please desist from the edit war/flame war that you and DFDL are having right now, you both risk being blocked for a period of time. SirFozzie (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

How am I harassing? I was BRINGING BACK STATEMENTS HE REMOVED. I brought them all back and you can look at them yourselves from the log, he has been doing nothing but removing my statements this morning, he has done do it to an Admin and I'm pleading with you for trying to defend myself instead of penalizing me for trying to revert his removal of my words. I can't believe he got away scot free, he removed my statements, I tried to be the better man and tried to ask for help and guess what? I was reverted yet again for seeking help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikiquette_alerts&action=history

So while my comments were completely removed and he got his own statements in there I couldn't ask for help. Can you not even sympathize at all with that predicament? I went to the Admins noticeboard, that managed to get the article locked EVEN after I explained the situation. He then says I insulted him for being dyslexic and yet looking at the comments I have not called him out for that.

Ok, you are blocked for 24 hours for harassment and disruption. Your friend also has a 48-hour block as it has not been his first offence - A l is o n  ❤ 01:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.

How am I harassing? I was BRINGING BACK STATEMENTS HE REMOVED. I brought them all back and you can look at them yourselves from the log, he has been doing nothing but removing my statements this morning, he has done do it to an Admin and I'm pleading with you for trying to defend myself instead of penalizing me for trying to revert his removal of my words. I can't believe he got away scot free, he removed my statements, I tried to be the better man and tried to ask for help and guess what? I was reverted yet again for seeking help:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikiquette_alerts&action=history

So while my comments were completely removed and he got his own statements in there I couldn't ask for help. Can you not even sympathize at all with that predicament? I went to the Admins noticeboard, that managed to get the article locked EVEN after I explained the situation. He then says I insulted him for being dyslexic and yet looking at the comments I have not called him out for that.

Mediation request
I am posting this here for User:Edit Centric, who has kindly agreed to step in as a third-party mediator. He cannot post due to the current page protection. I am merely passing this along. Please try to work with him. --Jayron32. talk . contribs 21:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Post-block discussions
HeaveTheClay, once your block is lifted, I cordially invite you to participate in discussions on the article at Super Smash Brothers Brawl. Please remember when participating in these discussions, to follow the following suggestions; Again, once your account is unblocked, I encourage you to take part in these discussions, as they can not only serve the article and Wikipedia as a whole, but also build your skills as an editor. Thank you, and I look forward to seeing you there! Edit Centric (talk) 20:05, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Please remain civil.
 * The past is exactly that, the past. Leave it at the door.
 * Be constructive, clear and concise in describing what you would like to accomplish.
 * NO REVERT WARRING. 3 Revert Rule applies dynamically.
 * Try to work towards concensus, or at the least, compromise.

Re: Just a suggestion for the Super smash Bros series page
Sure, why not? -- ReyBrujo (talk) 02:12, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Verifiability
We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Ganon, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 18:02, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

sorry
I want to say sorry and that i have chnaged it back the way it was.--Lbrun12415 02:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Question as you can see I found proof of them in but how do you only make it one source since they are all from the same one?--Lbrun12415 17:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

can we use this?
http://www.mariowiki.com/images/thumb/9/99/F4p7rq-1-.jpg/408px-F4p7rq-1-.jpg .--Lbrun12415 16:45, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Re
Thanks for telling me about this. I'm going to keep a close eye on the OoT article from now on. I'm feeling a deja vu here...didn't Wikipedian do this to the Super Smash Bros. Brawl article a while back? He needs to learn to agree with people more easily... --haha169 (talk) 03:24, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

speedy
""db-reason|Tagged since May, no improvement for it's notability reinforcement." is not a reason for speedy. Only the reasons listed under WP:CSD maybe used. See also WP:Deletion policy]]  Deletion is the last resort--you should first try to improve the article. Any article that even  asserts any importance, is not a speedy. . DGG (talk) 00:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Ocarina of Time
Please do not revert any more. The content you added was undue weight and was also badly written. If you continue this behaviour, I'll report you to an admin. If you so strongly want the content in the article, then start a discussion on the talk page. And the fact that GTA IV has similar content is of no relevance at all; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Thanks. The Prince (talk) 20:29, 27 September 2008 (UTC)