User talk:Heaviest567

Speedy deletion nomination of Mikel Ruffinelli
Hello Heaviest567,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mikel Ruffinelli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 21:17, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Mikel Ruffinelli. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:37, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Mikel Ruffinelli
Hello, Heaviest567,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Mikel Ruffinelli should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Mikel Ruffinelli.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:52, 30 March 2013 (UTC)