User talk:Heavy Brother

Why? What's wrong with anonymously reporting someone for 3RR? Heavy Brother 03:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Heavy Brother 03:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * John seems to be taking care of you, so I'll let him handle this.--Chaser - T 05:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

If you tell us the name of your normal account, we can have the account unblocked. John254 03:58, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, should I email you to tell you? I want to remain anonymous to the 3RR offender. Heavy Brother 03:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * And yes I now realize that one of the reverts was reverting vandalism. I didn't realize that at the time. It was just a mistake. I was actually going to make an edit to apologize for that mistake when I saw that I was blocked. Heavy Brother 04:02, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I had reported him before when he made 6 or 7 reverts, none of them for vandalism, and he blocked for it. Heavy Brother 04:13, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You can email the name of your normal account to d6382102@hotmail.com John254 04:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks. Heavy Brother 04:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Unblock
Based on email conversations with this user, and an admitted misunderstanding of the policy, I have lifted the block that I initially issued to this user, who has a significant and clean edit history on another account. The user is now aware of the policy and has been advised to scramble the password to this account and never use it again. There are significant collateral damage implications of this block with an autoblock, so the autoblock has been lifted. Note that this user has not been required to abandon the account, but has been educated about the appropriate use of multiple accounts and sockpuppet policy. If the user chooses to use a second account in compliance with WP:SOCK, it should not be held against them. - Philippe &#124; Talk 16:19, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

And where is this apology?
You used your sob story to the admin to get reinstated., Congrats. However, i never heard you were unblocked, and I never seemed to get that apology you siad you were "about to send me" when you were blocked. Since you set up the account as an attack account, and furthermore are actively seeking to further conceal your regular username, I find it a tad difficult to believe you at all. I find it exceptionally difficult to not believe you are not someone I have had significant contact with before. You get to stalk my edits, and I am not afforded the same opportunity? Sorry, it doesn't work like that; what's good fro the goose is good for the gander. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  03:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The only person still keeping this alive is you. This user did exactly what I told them to: ceased using that account immediately upon finding out that it was not allowed as a single-purpose account.  There have been no contributions since 9/25 from this account.  This matter is closed.  There is no further need for you to keep this alive. - Philippe &#124; Talk 14:03, 9 October 2007 (UTC)