User talk:Heavy Horse

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Heavy Horse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of etchings by Rembrandt. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

List of etchings by Rembrandt - quick note but great appreciation
Hey Heavy Horse - damn fine unstinting and most effective work - it's what this project really needs! --Shirt58 (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * FECI QUOD POTUI, FACIANT MELIORA POTENTES Heavy Horse (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Cacatne ursus in sylvis? :-) --Shirt58 (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Botticelli louvre 5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Botticelli louvre 5.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your wonderful list List of engravings by Dürer
would imho need one more field for the musea. Regards Oursana (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I do not think that it is necessary to introduce a new field for museums, because many museums have a collection of engravings by Dürer, for example,

The British Museum Metropolitan Museum of Art Art Institute, Chicago Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Fogg Art Museum Hermitage Staatliche Museen, Berlin Kupferstichkabinett, Dresden Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg Staatliche Kunsthalle, Karlsruhe and so on. Sincerely Yours, Heavy Horse (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

June 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2048 (video game), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your attention to my humble contribution to Wikipedia.

1.You are certainly right, all statements shall contain a reference to the source. However, I draw your attention to the fact that in this case we are not talking about a value judgment, opinion or historical fact, but of easy mathematical problem. Under the terms of the game, the number of points for the colliding of two identical tiles doubles. 2+2 = 4. Therefore, for «4» tile two pairs give 4 points, for «8» - 16, and so on, for «2^n» - (n-1)2^n points. Thus, the maximum is 16 +48 +128+ ...+ 2097152 = 3932160 points if the game uses only «2» tiles. But every «4» tile decreases this number. So actually number of points is less, such as in the photo you destroyed (3869064). Let’s write correctly: Maximum points in the game not exceeds 3932160. What we refer? The fact that 2+2 = 4? The multiplication table? 2+2 = 4. Chesterton wrote about this, Dostoevsky, Proust, Orwell... 2. Maybe you do not like the photo or "image breaks section headers". You can re-size it or move. But why destroy? I really hope that you do to fix it. Sincerely Yours. Heavy Horse (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure, WP:CALC allows Wikipedia editors to make "routine calculations" without needing a source, but this analysis seems too complex to be considered "routine" - checking the web, other people seem to have arrived at different answers, so it's not that clear cut. Attaching a source would allow the reader to check the context behind that score, rather than having to trust Wikipedia's unsourced voice of authority - it would also discourage others from "correcting" the article to a different score if their calculation came out differently. --McGeddon (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Rembrandt Paintings project
Thank you so much for updating this page with the latest attributions, great work!!! Vlad b (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

New page - "Paintings formerly attributed to Rembrandt" - worth creating?
Hi Heavy Horse, I'm thinking about creating a page "Paintings formerly attributed to Rembrandt", which would include an incomplete list of paintings that are not currently (as of volume 6, 2014) recognized as Rembrandt by the Research project, but considered Rembrandt in the past, or still listed as Rembrandt in its museum. This list could include paintings such as "Man in Golden Helmet" in Berlin and "Old Man in Red" in the Hermitage:.

What do you think? Is such a list a good idea?

Vlad b (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * May be. But this list will consist of approximately 500 paintings! Heavy Horse (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)


 * That's true, I thought about that. That's why it doesn't need to be a complete list, but it can grow over time and include the more famous paintings with some notes. Vlad b (talk) 19:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

IPBE
Hi,

Just noting that I have removed your IPBE as you are no longer affected by a block. Best, Mike V • Talk 18:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)