User talk:Heavyrock~enwiki

I saw that you reversed my edit. May I learn more why so? Please take into account the reasons I stated in the edit summary. Thank you so much! :) Thomas S. Major 02:25, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

My apologies for reverting your edit
Dear Heavyrock. Welcome to Wikipedia!

My sincerest apologies though for reverting your latest edit. There is an existing photo of the cilice. The additional photo of the cilice you linked to is therefore unnecessary. The same goes to the addditional details which unnecessarily lengthens our introduction. I hope you understand. Best wishes. Marax 08:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Let's stick to proportions
I reverted your move for discussion on 1950 constitutions, what you called "secret constitutions". The issue of secrecy already dealt with in the general strategy-- that is the space it is given based on NPOV proportionality. Pradeshkava 05:41, 20 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Heavyrock-- the Opus Dei article has caused me a lot of Wikistress over the last few months. This seems to be wikipedia weak spot-- NPOV is hard to acheive on articles where a lot of like-minded people have strong views on an issue, but where people who disagree are less likely to devote an equal amount of energy to the same article.   At this point, the Opus Dei article has so many NPOV problems, and so many good edits are easily reverted, that I have absolutely no hope that further discussion and simple editing will result in a page that complies with my intepretation of NPOV as it applies to this article.   If it's going to happen, it'll take an arbcom case, or some major solicitation of eyeballs.   I can't figure out how to get this page to a better place, and it frustrates me to no end.  I've been hesistant to devote the energy to doing a full arbcom case, because if it doesn't go my way-- it'll mean that wikipedia and I have to part ways-- either I am misapplying it's priniciples and should stop editing it, or else Wikipedia just doesn't work.  I don't want that to happen, so I'm sort of procrastinating about the whole thing-- but if you want Opus Dei fixed, that's the direction I think you'll have to take, and I'll support ya as best I can. --Alecmconroy 05:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Ruiz Mateos
Not a member, really. Didn't you know that? Ndss 10:22, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * hey heavy!! You proved me right, didn't you? ;) Thanks pal. Ndss 08:41, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Check this out: http://www.pontealdia.net/dinero/rumasa.htm

==

Opus Dei
Heavyrock, I have done a major rewrite on the Opus Dei article and am requesting comments on its talk page. Could you look it over and comment on whether the rewrite is an improvment and maybe help out in the ensuing discussion? --Alecmconroy 08:16, 27 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi Alec, my congratulations to you for your efforts with these articles, by the way, do you understand Spanish language? Why? well I think that the information about OD in that language is very useful, for your interest about the prelature. The enormous amount with very hight quality information from ex members, testimonies, deep analysis, books about controversial elements, internal OD documents, writings of the foundator, etc published by opuslibros are an excellent source..--Heavyrock 02:11, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sadly, no-- I do not speak Spanish. I wish I did-- I wish I could speak every language there is, of course.  I have however perused some of the spanish-language information on Opus Dei with the help of the automated translation services.  Fortunately, there has been enough written on Opus Dei in English that I think we have all we need for the purposes of a short encyclopedia article.  --Alecmconroy 05:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Eutony
The 190.28 floating ip anon keeps going after this. It's getting to the point where it might need to go to WP:AN/I. Appreciate your thoughts. Dloh cierekim  19:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Heavyrock. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Heavyrock~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)