User talk:Heba93

Speedy deletion nomination of Nico van der Meulen


A tag has been placed on Nico van der Meulen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Greenmaven (talk) 09:28, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright and promotion
Wikipedia cannot accept text copied from elsewhere unless a formal copyright release has been made - see WP:Copy-paste and for more detail Copyrights. Just asserting permission to use text is not enough.

It is unlikely to be worth making a copyright release, because material written for other purposes usually has a promotional tone unsuitable for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia should not be approached as a noticeboard for display of promotional material: it is not for advertising or promotion of any kind, and is very resistant to attempts to use it in that way.

If you are connected with the subjects you have written about, please read the guideline Conflict of interest.

Article subjects need to have notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.''" There is good advice on writing an aceptable article at WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 16:49, 25 April 2012 (UTC)