User talk:Hebsen/Archive 1

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Heb the best! Thank you for your contributions. I am Broadwaygenius and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Broadwaygenius  (talk)  07:00, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Government of Denmark has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Government of Denmark was changed by Heb the best (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.979188 on 2018-06-20T06:34:47+00:00.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brexit withdrawal agreement has been accepted
 Brexit withdrawal agreement, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Brexit_withdrawal_agreement help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Great Belt Bridge rail accident
Would you please add translations of the titles of articles in Danish to the relevant references. Use  to add the parameter to the reference. Mjroots (talk) 19:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have done this now. Please tell me if there is other things I can improve on the article - I am relatively new to this. ― Heb the best (talk) 20:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The only other (minor) issue is windspeeds which I raised on the talk page. You're doing great work. Mjroots (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

What's a year between friends?
I must have been thinking of the 'nearly there' in December 17 when May agreed a deal very like Johnson's one this week, but she crumpled under DUP opposition whereas he has decided to wing it. Now there's a surprise. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:26, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, in Brexit things happen so quickly that time becomes dilated. It is as if special relativity applies. ― Hebsen(previously Heb the best) (talk) 21:06, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Removal of my image on Brexit page
You have removed my picture which I placed to add and grow what was already on the page, and show the democratic process of Brexit.

You have also falsely marked it as Reverting vandalism or test edit, when it was a genuine addition made to add and contribute to the page.

Marking it as Reverting Vandalism regardless of providing an or addition may still get my account blacklisted.

Please could you reinstate my picture if possible, as I took time and effort to create to image and then edit to arrange the area on the page.

Many thanks

Michael Brexit (edit) Revision as of 18:52, 21 December 2019 31 BYTES REMOVED, 7 HOURS AGO

Undid revision 931856971 by ChefBear01 (talk) Reverting vandalism or test edit

ChefBear01 (talk) 02:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , at first sight, it appeared to be vandalism/test edit. If I had been a little less speedy, I would perhaps have reverted it as "not constructive". First of all, you put the image right on the top, taking most of the screen space and all the attention. This is not where images are supposed to be. Secondary, the image is an oversimplification of the topic. Brexit is a divisive issue, and we should be careful what images we use to illustrate it. We should use diagrams to express data, and we should use images to illustrate important people, places or events related to Brexit. We should not use artistic interpretations about how Brexit is, that is WP:Original research, and we do not host that. You picture is not appropriate in the article. I know it is annoying that someone reverts your work, but once you get to know wikipedia better, you will see that sometimes we need to revert edits to make sure Wikipedia is as helpful to our readers as possible. Happy editing! ― Hebsen (talk) 02:46, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok thank you for your feedback ChefBear01 (talk) 10:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your username
Hi Hebsen. What you say about your username and allowing usurpation confuses me and bodes difficulties. Why not "hard fork" to a quite different name? I did in August 2019 and there hasn't been the slightest problem. Found a nice picture too. Errantius (talk) 22:03, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi . Because I wished to carry over my edit and in that sense tie the two usernames together more that I could do by just making a new account. And in addition, I wanted to keep the "Heb"-part of my username, and that turned out to required usurpation, which is only possible with an established account. The context is this and this. In short, I found that good names related to "Heb" is in short supply, so I thought I should allow others to use my username, if I once became inactive to an extend, that I would probably never return. And then I wrote that text. ― Hebsen (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If somebody now usurps your name, confusion. There are already a "Hebsen" and a "Hebsen (usurped)".  While there are lots of "Heb-"s, plenty of variations have been invented.  Or, like me, you can just join the born-again.  Errantius (talk) 23:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but confusion in the future is not something for me to worry about. That is the job of future global renamers. Anyway, name change is not relevant for me anymore. ― Hebsen (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Moving a Page while under an RM discussion
Hi, please don't move a page while there is an RM under discussion. The discussion was for a specific requested move and it's considered bad form to move a page while the discussion is still underway. If you have a specific name you want to propose, then feel free to do so in the discussion. Thanks, Sir Joseph (talk) 02:44, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I understand, but everything was really confusing. It started out as a simple merge request, that I boldly performed on the right article history-wise, but the wrong one name-wise. That is why I made that uncontroversial move request, because I could not perform the move myself. At that time, there were not a rename request, only the merge request, and it was then later changed to a move request (so the first couple of support was actually not about the rename request, but about the merge request). At that point it seemed that every one agreed that the current title was the wrong one, and that we were just waiting for that move to go through. So I decided to move it to a more properly name, after several people pointed out that "Iranian" should be in the name. I acknowledge that I choose that title without much discussion, except one editor who had proposed it, and I acknowledge that I did the move out of order. But I felt that we should end the confusion, so we could discuss what the proper title should be, rather than how to technically move away from the current one. I hope I didn't cause too much disruption.
 * Would you be kind to change the requested move discussion to one without any specific title? The discussion it not really only about that name, but more general about what name the article should be. I feel I have messed with this way to much already, and that it would be good for something else to do it. ― Hebsen (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , at this point in time you just have to let it play out. The RM discussion has to stay active in general for 7 days. During that time people can make recommendations on best names and at the end of that time period whatever the consensus will be will be determined by that discussion. I don't think you need to make separate sections in the RM discussion, it will make it more complicated and unnecessary. Sir Joseph (talk) 03:54, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Brexit
Hello, Here, I know what you're saying. But there appear to be no liberals or centrists who are Brexit unless I have been ignorant for many years. --Tomb Blaster (talk) 17:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, I have moved it to Talk:Brexit ― Hebsen (talk) 18:54, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Noted. I'll stay tuned to it- --Tomb Blaster (talk) 19:03, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!


We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts. We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:


 * WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
 * WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik  talk 09:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hard Line (political party) shortname templates


A tag has been placed on Category:Hard Line (political party) shortname templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Daxit
I should really have left it to you to fix Talk:Danish withdrawal from the European Union. Feel free to revert my edit and repost your challenge first in sequence in the conventional style of talk pages. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I see where you are going. I was careless to not explain in more depth what was inaccurate. I have made some minor changes to keep the chronology clear for the reader. ― Hebsen (talk) 19:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Between 2015 and 2019 they changed to Identity and Democracy before they was in the European Conservatives and Reformists. That´s why only far-right. Wname1 (talk) 14:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
 * That is a very narrow view you take there. Their EP-group is only one of many parameters that define a party's position on the political spectrum, and frankly not the most important. In Danish media, the change was covered as "DPP make alliance with far-right parties", not "DPP has become far-right". Also, DPP and others said that the launch of ID were an attempt to unite the Euroskeptics in one group - it did not succeed - and that they did not agree on everything. ― Hebsen (talk) 08:32, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
Cabayi (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Danish withdrawal from the European Union
Would you keep an eye on Danish withdrawal from the European Union. I have already twice reverted the addition of a nn facebook group, so i will be on a 3rr bio if I do it again. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Would you raise the WP:ANI for multiple 3RR violations, please. We have now reached five editors whose time he (it will be a he) has wasted. I could be seen as part of the problem, so best that I take a step back. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * yes, I have done so. Thank you for also engaging in this. Issues like these are difficult to handle if you are only one person. I had lucky forgotten all about that page, but now it was brought back to my attention. I guess it is soon time to WP:NUKEIT, but I think we should have an article on Danish euroskepticism, and that is all that has been holding me back. ― Hebsen (talk) 17:58, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you.
 * Well if you really are going to start again, 'nook' away. But I definitely would not want to take the nuclear option chosen by dk.wikipedia in just deleting the article. Escape valves are useful, if only to undermine the populist-as-victim-here we-are-being-censored trope.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:24, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

In your place, I would have just removed the false statements again, rather than tagging. If you can find a moment, I still think that you should do so rather than let them stand in wp:wikipedia's voice. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:26, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I do not wish to edit war. I think I need a clear consensus in favor of my edits. I foresee that this case will probably soon again reach an administrator's noticeboard, and I think it is important that the case is clear, given that the last case lead to nothing. ― Hebsen (talk) 20:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)


 * You play the long game better than I do. Though this time I made sure to place the uw-editwar1 on his talk page (having already placed a uw-disruptive2). I won't be surprised if he deletes them as usual, so I will need to record the diffs. I will look at your proposed changes now. If he is subject to BRD, you have to be too (even though he failed to notify you as I did him). --John Maynard Friedman (talk)

Your draft article, Draft:Division of Schleswig


Hello, Hebsen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Division of Schleswig".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Klaus Riskær Pedersen (party)/meta/abbr
Template:Klaus Riskær Pedersen (party)/meta/abbr has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)