User talk:HecquetK

Your submission at Articles for creation: Five-minus-one method (December 21)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bilorv was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Five-minus-one method and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Five-minus-one method, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Five-minus-one_method Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bilorv&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Five-minus-one_method reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Bilorv ( talk ) 14:46, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Citing yourself, other problems
Hello, HecquetK, and welcome to Wikipedia. I am JohnFromPinckney. I wanted to let you know I have reverted your edits to Voting advice application, for a number of reasons. One item is the exceptional use of external links within the prose, something we generally do not do here (although it is certainly the usual, helpful way of writing on other websites). I was trying to convert the links to smartvote and the VG VAA into references, but I realized before I published that they did not actually verify the numbers of questions you stated in your added text. It seems we have/had no sources for those figures, nor the "most have between 25 and 35 statements" claim, so we have a lot of unsourced material, which is another reason for removal.

Also tricky is your addition of articles apparently written by yourself as references. You added in three places identical citations to "Sådan har vi lavet kandidattesten", an article written by Kristoffer Hecquet. Is that you? If it is (and you needn't explicitly out yourself here!), then it appears inappropriate to be doing these kinds of edits, as it may go against WP:SELFCITE. Could you please read through that section (and indeed, all of the WP:COI page and make sure you're conforming to our guideline?

I don't require or expect a response here, and you are welcome to delete this section especially if you are uncomfortable about possibly revealing your RL identity. (Further, an admin can RevDel the entry so non-admin users can't ever see the contents.) I just wanted to explain my reversion and request that you pay good attention to our guidelines. Happy editing,&mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 02:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Five-minus-one method
Hello, HecquetK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Five-minus-one method, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)