User talk:HectorBabic

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Rabaeus (October 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicolas Rabaeus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Nicolas_Rabaeus Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamiebuba&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nicolas_Rabaeus reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 19:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Jamie,
 * Thank you for your reviewing. I do feel though that the coverage meets the criterias. We have here a full portrait in Cinebulletin (which is the main Swiss cinema newspaper), and more than 5 hours of coverage on the main swiss national radio (RSR) with : a 5 episode portrait (+some writing), coverage of recording sessions.
 * Also an article from the HEAD school (which Rabaeus is not part of).
 * Do you think you could re-consider the rejection ? HectorBabic (talk) 09:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Your article was not "Rejected", I only "declined" it. These are two different things. Rejection means you will not be able to submit the draft again. The Cinebulletin source is not a reliable source, same as RSR. Please see No original research and WP:IS. Jamiebuba (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply. Sorry for my confusion of terms.
 * Please allow me to disagree, but RSR a very reliable source. It's the main public news outlet in Switzerland, and the main source of information for the population. Highly respected, neutral, and fact-checked. If RSR is not reliable, then I'm not sure what is. It is as reliable as Le Temps for example. I'm not sure I understand the reason you consider it non-reliable. Is it the coverage cited in the article specifically ?
 * Cinebulletin is more grey zone I would say. It's still a public funded newspaper (federal funding), but specialised in Cinema. For the professionals of cinema, it's definitely a very reliable source (has been since 1975). Again, please forgive my ignorance, but I'm not sure why you would say it's not reliable.
 * Thank you for your time.
 * Best HectorBabic (talk) 09:26, 2 October 2023 (UTC)