User talk:Heheomgwow5314

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to D.O. (singer) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:26, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: D.O. (singer) was changed by Heheomgwow5314 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876829 on 2016-01-10T00:26:47+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at D.O. (singer). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges.  CatcherStorm    talk   00:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at D.O. (singer), you may be blocked from editing.  CatcherStorm    talk   00:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kim jongin


A tag has been placed on Kim jongin, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Diana, Princess of Wales. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Diana, Princess of Wales was changed by Heheomgwow5314 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95849 on 2016-01-10T00:41:45+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at D.O. (singer). Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit to 2016 North Korean nuclear test
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2016 North Korean nuclear test, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)